Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HO 23.07.1982 856/82 AI generated

Court dismisses tenant's claim that a reasonless lease termination is void under Housing Act.

Case Number Vaasan HO 23.07.1982 856/82
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the tenant's appeal regarding the termination of a commercial lease agreement without a stated reason. The tenant argued that the termination was void under Section 34(2) of the Housing Act, while the landlord contended the notice was legally sufficient. The court ruled that the statutory requirement for a reasonless termination to be void applies strictly and found the procedural grounds for the tenant's claim lacking in this specific instance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 34(2) of the Housing Act; A lease termination without a stated reason is deemed void only if the tenant successfully challenges the landlord's right to terminate under the specific conditions of the Act.

Keywords

AI generated
Housing Act termination reasonless lease void commercial tenancy dispute tenant appeal dismissed statutory termination rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 34(2) of the Housing Act

Cited Case Law

AI generated
HelHO decision D:V1973/735 No. 103
AI generated
appeal_1976_turku__3508
Fixed-term tenancy clause cannot restrict statutory termination procedures under Housing Act Section 4.
appeal_1975_helsinki__106
Tenant lease terminated by landlord; sale of ownership shares to third party does not invalidate termination without new notice.
appeal_1975_helsinki__165
Tenant's eviction appeal dismissed because landlord failed to prove health reasons for needing the unit.
appeal_1975_helsinki__207
Tenant eviction upheld where statutory notice period defaults to calendar month end if not specified.
kko-precedent_2014_4
Supreme Court allows appeal for unclear lease termination rules between fixed and periodic terms.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Liikehuoneistoa koskeva vuokrasopimus oli irtisanottu kirjallisella irtisanomisilmoituksella, jossa ei ollut mainittu irtisanomisen perustetta. Irtisanominen on huoneenvuokralain 34 §:n 2 momentin nojalla katsottu mitättömäksi.

Ks. HelHO:n päätös D:V1973/735 N:o 103

Lakimies 1975 s. 1010

Lainvoimainen