Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Rovaniemen HO 03.06.1982 568/82 AI generated

Failure to submit written appeal instructions within the statutory deadline results in dismissal of the appeal.

Case Number Rovaniemen HO 03.06.1982 568/82
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to submit written appeal instructions to the court registry within the strict time limit mandated by law. Although the appellant sent a notification of dissatisfaction via telex immediately after the first-instance judgment was announced, this method did not comply with the procedural requirements for formal written instructions. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible due to this procedural defect, rendering the first-instance decision legally binding.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Oikeudenkäymiskaaren 25 luvun 3 §:n 2 momentti; Appeals must be submitted in writing within the statutory period, and failure to do so renders the appeal inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural deadline written appeal instructions inadmissible appeal court registry statutory time limit

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Oikeudenkäymiskaaren 25 luvun 3 §:n 2 momentti

Cited Case Law

AI generated
RovHO D:R81/356
RovHO D:R81/356, valituskirjelmä
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A, jolle oli heti kihlakunnanoikeuden päätöksen julistamisen jälkeen annettu oikeudenkäymiskaaren 25 luvun 3 §:n 2 momentin mukaisesti kirjalliset muutoksenhakuohjeet, oli lähettänyt tyytymättömyyden ilmoituksensa tuomiokunnan kansliaan sähkeitse. Tyytymättömyyden ilmoitusta ei katsottu tehdyn säädetyssä järjestyksessä eikä sitä hyväksytty.

Vrt. RovHO D:R81/356, valituskirjelmä

Lainvoimainen