Appeal dismissed; custody claim left unexamined by lower court due to procedural bar.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal regarding a divorce case where the lower court had granted custody to the respondent. The appellant sought to have the custody and visitation rights claim examined, but this request was explicitly left unexamined by the lower court under Section 2, Paragraph 2, Subsection 4 of the Act on the Administration of Justice. Consequently, the appellate court found no grounds to review the merits of the custody issue because the lower court had not addressed it.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedSection 2, Paragraph 2, Subsection 4 of the Act on the Administration of Justice; A claim left unexamined by the lower court cannot be reviewed on appeal.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
A ja B oli A:n kanteesta tuomittu raastuvanoikeudessa avioeroon.
Raastuvanoikeus oli uskonut B:n vaatimuksesta, johon A oli myöntynyt, lasten huollon B:lle. A oli muutoksenhakemuksessaan pyytänyt paitsi elatusavun määrän alentamista, myöskin lasten tapaamis- ja luonapito-oikeutta. Viimeeksi mainittu vaatimus jätettiin OK l4 luvun 2 §:n 2 mom:n nojalla vasta hovioikeudessa tehtynä tutkimatta.
KKO:n ratkaisu:
Päätös 15.6.1982 n:o 2763: Ei valituslupaa