Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Itä-Suomen HO 17.12.1981 TU-683/81 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal regarding reasonableness of legal costs when multiple related cases share the same lawyer and evidence.

Case Number Itä-Suomen HO 17.12.1981 TU-683/81
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court of appeal dismissed the applicant's appeal concerning the reasonableness of awarded legal costs. The applicant argued that costs should be reduced because they were involved in several other cases from the same basis, shared the same lawyer, and used identical evidence. The court rejected this, noting that the KKO precedent established that such circumstances do not automatically justify a reduction in costs for a specific case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Korvauksen määrästä sääneet säännökset; Kun sama vastaa on ollut useissa samasta perusteesta johtuvissa kanteissa, ei tämä ole perustelua korvauksen vähentämiseen.

Keywords

AI generated
legal costs reasonableness multiple related cases shared legal representative identical evidence costs reduction appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Korvauksen määrästä sääneet säännökset

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KKO:n ratkaisu: Päätös n:o 1555, A:2.4.1982
AI generated
kko-other_2020_1660
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, upholding lower courts' rejection of asylum claimant's request to cancel deportation order.
labour_2015_23
Union's appeal dismissed; employer's refusal to negotiate collective agreement upheld as lawful.
labour_2018_84
Union's appeal dismissed; court upheld employer's right to set working hours without union agreement.
kko-other_2020_1664
Supreme Court dismisses appeal and remands case regarding refusal of asylum seeker's appeal against deportation order.
labour_2006_45
Paperi union withdrew suit; court orders 500 euro cost payment to respondent parties.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kantajalle tuomitun oikeudenkäyntikulujen korvauksen kohtuullisuutta harkittaessa otettiin huomioon, että samaa vastaajaa vastaan oli samalla kertaa, mutta eri juttuina ajettu useita muita samasta perusteesta johtuvia kanteita ja jutuissa kaikilla kantajilla oli ollut sama oikeudenkäyntiasiamies ja niissä kaikissa oli esitetty pääasiallisesti sama oikeudenkäyntiaineisto.

KKO:n ratkaisu:

Päätös n:o 1555, A:2.4.1982: ei valituslupaa.