Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Itä-Suomen HO 02.06.1981 PÄ-484/81 AI generated

Court dismissed partner's request to appoint liquidator for deceased partner's firm estate due to insufficient grounds.

Case Number Itä-Suomen HO 02.06.1981 PÄ-484/81
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the partner's application to appoint a liquidator for the deceased partner's firm estate. The applicant argued that the firm's assets might be insufficient to cover debts or that his own rights were at risk. The court rejected this claim, finding the applicant failed to demonstrate a sufficient risk of insolvency or threat to his rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Partnership Act; Limited Partnership Act: A partner's request to appoint a liquidator for a deceased partner's estate is dismissed if the applicant fails to prove that the estate's assets are insufficient to cover debts or that the applicant's rights are endangered.

Keywords

AI generated
limited partnership deceased partner estate liquidation insolvency risk partner liability court of appeal partnership law
AI generated
appeal_1982_eastern-finland__1753
Appeal court remands case for retrial due to failure to notify foreign heirs before asset sale.
kko-precedent_2011_95
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; sale of estate share denied due to unproven inability to pay debts without it.
appeal_1976_turku__456
Appeal dismissed because the deceased's representative lacked standing to challenge the estate administrator's actions.
kko-precedent_1996_37
Supreme Court allows appeal against interim trustee appointment in bankruptcy proceedings as a final decision on continuation.
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__211
Appeal court orders division of marital property despite lower court dismissal, finding division necessary and executor suitable.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

RO oli kommandiittiyhtiön vastuunalaisen yhtiömiehen A:n hakemuksesta määrännyt pesänselvittäjän sanotun yhtiön toisen vastuunalaisen yhtiömiehen B:n kuolinpesään. Kuolinpesän osakkaiden valituksesta HO hylkäsi A:n hakemuksen, koskei A, joka tosin myös oli vastuussa yhtiön toiminnasta kuolinpesälle mahdollisesti aiheutuneen velan maksamisesta, ollut saattanut todennäköiseksi, että kuolinpesän varat kävisivät riittämättömiksi sen velkojen maksamiseen tai että A:n oikeus muustakaan syystä joutuisi vaaranalaiseksi.

Aarnio: Perintöoikeus, 1974, ss. 185-187

Heikonen: Avoin yhtiö, 1948, ss. 195-198, 286-303,

318-321, 340, 373-374 ja 417-419

Hyvönen - Caselius: Avoin yhtiö ja kommandiittiyhtiö, 1972, ss. 60-71, 86-92 ja 100-101

Lainvoimainen