Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HO 27.05.1980 25/80 AI generated

Court rules debt from overpaid detention is recoverable despite pension and salary protection rules.

Case Number Vaasan HO 27.05.1980 25/80
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court held that debt arising from overpaid detention constitutes recoverable property regardless of its origin. While the debtor argued that specific protections for pensions and salaries should exempt this debt from enforcement, the court rejected this distinction. Consequently, the court ruled that standard enforcement procedures apply to this specific type of debt.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Veronpalautuslaki 1980:1000; Ulosmittauslaki 1980:1001: Debt arising from overpaid detention is recoverable property, and statutory protections for pensions and salaries do not exempt such debts from enforcement proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
overpaid detention debt enforcement of pensions salary protection rules tax recovery law recovery of property enforcement proceedings origin of debt

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Veronpalautuslaki 1980:1000
Ulosmittauslaki 1980:1001

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KKO:n ratkaisu 4961/80 A:1.4.1981
KKO:1981-II-36
tiedonanto KKO:1981-II-36
AI generated
insurance_1980_1976-1979
Insurance court dismissed pension claim for repayment due to prior VI committee's final decision on non-recoverability.
kko-precedent_2006_30
Supreme Court allows creditor's appeal dismissal due to lack of direct impact on debtor's rights under enforcement law.
kko-precedent_2017_34
Supreme Court dismissed claim for collection act interest on tax refund due to tax collection law provisions.
kko-other_1997_1533
Supreme Court allows debtor to change payment practice to stop enforcement of alimony payments.
kko-precedent_1987_10
Supreme Court allows increase of wage garnishment protection amount for children from prior marriage receiving alimony.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Veronpalautus, joka oli muodostunut eläkkeestä liikaa peritystä pidätyksestä, on katsottu syntyperusteestaan riippumatta ulosmittauskelpoiseksi omaisuudeksi, johon ulosmittaamatta jätettävän palkan ja eläkkeen määrästä annettuja säännöksiä ei ole sovellettava.

Joutsenlahti: Eräitä oikeustapauksia ulosoton alalta,

Käytännön ulosotto-oikeutta. Lakimiesliiton julkaisusarja

N:o 12 s. 193-197, jossa viitataan HelHO:n käytäntöön.

KKO:n

ratkaisu:

Päätös n:o 4961/80 A:1.4.1981, Ks. tiedonanto KKO:1981-II-36