Court held that unauthorized use of father's car and shop burglary are separate crimes, not continuations of one offense.

The court dismissed the prosecution's argument that the defendant's unauthorized use of his father's car and subsequent shop burglary constituted a single continuous crime. The defendant was charged with both unauthorized use of a vehicle and theft, with the prosecution seeking to treat these acts as one continuous offense. The court ruled that these distinct criminal acts occurred at different times and locations, thereby establishing them as separate offenses rather than a continuation of a single crime.