Court held that a gun used in a threat cannot be confiscated as a criminal tool if the threat was unlawful.

The court of appeal dismissed the prosecution's request to confiscate a firearm used in an unlawful threat as a criminal tool. The prosecution argued the weapon facilitated the crime, while the defense contended the threat itself was unlawful and the weapon's possession was not criminal. The court ruled that since the threat was unlawful, the weapon could not be legally classified as a tool of a crime for confiscation purposes.