Appeal dismissed where disproportionate sentencing in one case violated equality principle compared to another case.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal regarding a sentence deemed disproportionately lenient compared to a co-defendant's sentence in the same case. The prosecution argued this disparity violated the principle of equality before the law, while the defense maintained the original sentencing was appropriate. The court rejected the claim, ruling that such a discrepancy did not constitute a legal error warranting a new trial.