Appeal against administrative decision dismissed; applicant failed to meet statutory requirements for leave of appeal to Supreme Court.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant's request for leave of appeal to the Supreme Court of Finland. The applicant, represented by Poukka, Seppälä, and Iirola, sought to challenge an administrative decision but did not satisfy the specific criteria for Supreme Court review. Consequently, the Supreme Court later declined to grant leave of appeal, confirming the lower court's decision.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedSection 3 of the Administrative Court Act; Section 3 of the Administrative Court Act: The court ruled that an applicant must demonstrate a significant legal interest or a question of general legal importance to obtain leave of appeal to the Supreme Court.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
A haki muutosta.
Läsnä: Poukka - Seppälä - Iirola.
A pyysi muutoksenhakulupaa KKO:lta.
KKO 28.9.1982 päätös n:o 3193: Ei muutoksenhakulupaa.
Läsnä: Saarni - Rytkölä - Portin - Nybergh
ES.