Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 22.03.1978 11 AI generated

Tenant loses lease rights after landlord proves permission for immoral conduct despite written warnings.

Case Number Helsingin HO 22.03.1978 11
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the tenant's appeal against the landlord's termination of the lease due to immoral conduct. The landlord had issued a written warning, yet the tenant continued to allow immoral activities in the rented premises. The court upheld the original decision, ruling that the tenant's failure to correct the situation after the warning justified the loss of lease rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 10 of the Lease Act 1975; Section 11 of the Lease Act 1975: A tenant loses the right to occupy the premises if they permit immoral conduct there, even if a written warning was issued.

Keywords

AI generated
immoral conduct lease termination tenant rights written warning lease agreement tenant obligations premises usage

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 10 of the Lease Act 1975
Section 11 of the Lease Act 1975

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KKO 6.3.1980 n:o 930
AI generated
appeal_1975_helsinki__184
Tenant successfully terminated lease due to lack of adequate housing conditions for himself and child.
appeal_1983_helsinki__429
Court dismisses appeal against robbery conviction when related eviction case is already resolved by lower court.
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__686
Tenant eviction for neighbor disturbance upheld; prior notice requirement for procedural violation not met.
appeal_1974_helsinki__105
Court dismissed tenant eviction claim because landlord failed to prove specific building portion needed for their own residence.
appeal_1974_helsinki__12
Tenant eviction for family housing needs upheld; landlord failed to prove necessity of larger unit.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Vuokratalo-osuuskunta A:n kanteesta Vantaan AO on tuomiossaan 16.12.1977 lausunut, että B oli sallinut osuuskunnan hänelle vuokraamassa huoneistossa ja talossa vietettävän pahantapaista elämää, eikä oikaisua ollut kirjallisesta huomautuksesta huolimatta tapahtunut. AO on sen vuoksi todennut, että B oli menettänyt vuokraoikeutensa ja velvoittanut hänet muuttamaan huoneistosta.

B haki muutosta.

Läsnä: af Hällström - Iirola - Piira - Pohjola - Kaarni

B pyysi muutoksenhakulupaa KKO:lta.

KKO 6.3.1980 päätös n:o 930: Ei muutoksenhakulupaa.

Läsnä: Leivonen - Nybergh - Ketola

ES.