Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 06.10.1976 334 AI generated

Tenant's eviction claim dismissed as landlord's personal housing need was deemed sufficient without further proof.

Case Number Helsingin HO 06.10.1976 334
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the tenant's appeal against the lower court's eviction order, ruling that the landlord's need for the property for personal use was established. The tenant argued for continued tenancy, but the court found his student status and lack of future enrollment plans at the training institute constituted adequate proof of housing necessity. Consequently, the lower court's decision to terminate the lease was upheld without modification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Housing Act; Landlord's personal housing need: A landlord's declaration of needing a property for personal use, supported by evidence of the tenant's lack of future need, is sufficient grounds for eviction without further proof.

Keywords

AI generated
housing need tenant eviction lease termination student housing personal use evidence sufficiency lower court appeal
AI generated
admin_1997_northern-karelia-county__108
Court allows income support claim for open university student denied primary benefits.
insurance_2005_1296-2004
Student housing allowance denied due to free dormitory right without special circumstances; court allows appeal.
insurance_2002_8829-2001
Student housing allowance denied due to free dormitory right unless special reasons prevent use.
appeal_1974_helsinki__12
Tenant eviction for family housing needs upheld; landlord failed to prove necessity of larger unit.
kho-precedent_2000_58
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; student's loan payments count as income despite lack of state guarantee.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A:n irtisanottua hänen ja B:n välisen vuokrasuhteen ilmoittaen irtisanomisen syyksi tarvitsevansa huoneiston omaan käyttöönsä asuntona Helsingin AO on tuomiossaan 13.5.1976 katsonut jääneen näyttämättä, että A tarvitsi huoneiston omaan käyttöönsä ja sen vuoksi hylännyt A:n vuokrasuhteen lakkaamisen toteamista koskevan kanteen.

A haki muutosta.

HO: Koska A on talvikauden 1975-1976 opiskellut Kajaanissa lastentarhanopettajien valmistuslaitoksessa eikä pelkästään hänen omaa ilmoitustaan siitä, ettei hän enää syksyllä 1976 aiokaan jatkaa siellä opintojaan valmistuakseen lastentarhanopettajaksi, voida pitää riittävänä selvityksenä hänen asunnontarpeestaan, ei ole syytä muuttaa AO:n tuomion lopputulosta.

Läsnä: af Hällström - Seppälä - Lakovaara - Wiias - Pohjola

ES.