Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 22.09.1976 321 AI generated

Tenant's lease termination upheld when landlord proves imminent occupancy by relatives' children.

Case Number Helsingin HO 22.09.1976 321
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the tenant's appeal against the lower court's confirmation of lease termination. The landlord demonstrated that his sister's grandchildren were arriving to live in the apartment, and the tenant did not contest this fact. Consequently, the court ruled that the termination was justified and the tenant must vacate.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 10 of the Lease Act 1975; A landlord may terminate a residential lease if they can prove imminent occupancy by close relatives' children, and the tenant's failure to contest this fact validates the termination.

Keywords

AI generated
residential lease termination imminent occupancy close relatives children tenant appeal dismissal Helsinki Court of Appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 10 of the Lease Act 1975
AI generated
appeal_1974_helsinki__51
Tenant eviction claim dismissed as no lease existed; court found no rent agreement and jurisdiction lacked.
appeal_1975_helsinki__124
Tenant's claim for rent reduction dismissed due to lack of evidence proving tenancy relationship.
appeal_1978_helsinki__370
Tenant's notice to landlord sufficed to terminate subtenant's right despite subtenant's objection.
appeal_1975_helsinki__340
Court of Appeal dismissed appeal because Housing Authority lacked jurisdiction over tenancy dispute.
appeal_1975_helsinki__135
Tenant lawfully occupying premises without formal termination is entitled to damages for unlawful eviction.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A:n irtisanottua omistamassaan huoneistossa asuneen B:n vuokrasuhteen päättymään Helsingin AO on tuomiossaan 13.5.1976 vahvistanut vuokrasuhteen irtisanomisen johdosta lakanneeksi.

B haki muutosta.

HO: Koska A on ilmoittanut kustantavansa Dragsfjärdin kunnassa asuvan sisarensa lastenlasten opiskelun Helsingissä ja koska B ei ole kiistänyt, etteivät nämä henkilöt olisi tulossa asumaan kyseiseen huoneistoon, ei ole syytä muuttaa AO:n tuomion lopputulosta.

Läsnä: af Hällström - Multia - Hyrkäs - Wiias - Pohjola

ES.