Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HO 11.12.1975 103/75 AI generated

Court rules horse trade price must include agreed stud fee value calculated at average market rate at performance deadline.

Case Number Vaasan HO 11.12.1975 103/75
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court upheld a claim for additional compensation in a horse sale contract where the seller failed to deliver a stud horse as agreed. The plaintiff argued the total price should include the stud horse's value, calculated based on the average market rate at the time the performance was due. The court agreed, ruling that the contract price must encompass the agreed stud fee value determined by prevailing market conditions when the performance deadline would have occurred.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

S. 1001 s. 1002 s. 1003 k.r.: When a contract specifies a price plus a separate item of value to be delivered, the total price must include the value of that item calculated according to the average market rate at the time the performance was due.

Keywords

AI generated
horse sale contract stud fee valuation average market rate performance deadline price calculation breach of contract compensation award

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 1001 k.r.
s. 1002 k.r.
s. 1003 k.r.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Kivimäki-Ylöstalo: Siviilioikeuden oppikirja, 1964, s. 446
Kivimäki-Ylöstalo: Siviilioikeuden oppikirja, 1964, s. 446
AI generated
appeal_1979_vaasa__772
Claim for lost business profit dismissed where buyer failed to demand performance within reasonable time.
kko-other_2016_2350
Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages from illegal competition restrictions due to statute of limitations expiry.
kko-precedent_2014_70
Supreme Court dismisses claim for price reduction based on buyer's binding waiver in independent settlement agreement.
kko-other_2016_2354
Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages from illegal competition restrictions due to statute of limitations expiry.
kko-precedent_2008_31
Supreme Court dismisses contractor's liability claim against third-party buyer due to lack of privity and pre-statute timing.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys hevoskaupassa myyjälle kauppahinnan lisäksi luvatun varsan arvosta.

Sopimukseen perustuvan luontoissuorituksen laiminlyönnistä johtuvan korvauksen määrä oli arvioitava sen keskimääräisen hintatason mukaan, joka vallitsi silloin, kun luontoissuoritus, jolle ei ollut asetettu määräpäivää, olisi voitu viimeistään täyttää.

Vrt. Kivimäki-Ylöstalo: Siviilioikeuden oppikirja, 1964, s. 446

Lainvoimainen