Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 30.04.1975 148 AI generated

Court of Appeal quites Rent of Residence Act decision for property in Kirkkonummi due to jurisdiction error.

Case Number Helsingin HO 30.04.1975 148
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal in Helsinki quashed the Regional Court's decision regarding a rental dispute over a sauna cabin in Kirkkonummi. The parties argued that the Regional Court lacked jurisdiction because the property is located in Kirkkonummi, not Hangö. The court ruled that the Regional Court was not the competent authority to hear the case under the relevant section of the Act on Rent of Residence, thereby dismissing the original judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Act on Rent of Residence 1970, Section 14; The Regional Court is not the competent authority to hear disputes concerning the rent of a residence located in Kirkkonummi, and such decisions must be quashed for lack of jurisdiction.

Keywords

AI generated
Act on Rent of Residence jurisdiction error competent authority property location quashing decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Act on Rent of Residence 1970, Section 14
AI generated
appeal_1979_helsinki__15
Tenant loses lease rights by unauthorized transfer; new occupant ordered to vacate without landlord consent.
appeal_1974_helsinki__51
Tenant eviction claim dismissed as no lease existed; court found no rent agreement and jurisdiction lacked.
appeal_1975_helsinki__184
Tenant successfully terminated lease due to lack of adequate housing conditions for himself and child.
appeal_1975_helsinki__247
Court dismisses appeal against tenant's rent claim because the original plaintiff lacked standing as the tenant was a company under his control.
appeal_1978_helsinki__142
Court allows tenant to vacate property when no rent payment or lease agreement exists.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A on Hangon RO:ssa vaatinut, että Hangossa asuva B, joka oli A:n edesmenneeltä isältä vuokrannut saunamökin Kirkkonummen kunnassa, velvoitettaisiin suorittamaan hänelle maksamatta jättämänsä vuokrat ja sähkömaksut sanotusta mökistä.

RO on päätöksessään 10.6.1974 velvoittanut B:n suorittamaan A:lle vuokraa ja saunamaksuja, mutta hylännyt kanteen osittain.

A ja B hakivat kumpikin muutosta.

HO: Koska kanteessa on kysymys Kirkkonummen kunnassa olevan kiinteistön huoneenvuokrasuhteesta, eikä Hangon RO siten, huomioon ottaen OK 10 luvun 14 §:n säännös, ole ollut oikea tuomioistuin käsittelemään asiaa, HO kumosi ja poisti RO :n päätöksen.

Läsnä: af Hällström - Seppälä - Multia - Pohjola - Kaarni

ES.