Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 28.08.1974 24 AI generated

Tenant must vacate premises upon lawful termination due to landlord's own use and local housing shortage.

Case Number Helsingin HO 28.08.1974 24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the tenant's appeal against the landlord's order to vacate the rental property. The landlord had lawfully terminated the tenancy on June 30, 1973, citing the need for personal use, and the tenant failed to object to the grounds within the required timeframe. The court ruled that the termination was valid and the move-out order was justified given the severe housing shortage in the Helsinki area at the time.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

S. 10 of the Tenancy Act 1973; Art. 17 of the Tenancy Act 1973: A tenant must vacate premises upon a lawful termination of the tenancy agreement, particularly when the termination is based on the landlord's own use of the property and the local housing situation renders the move-out order reasonable.

Keywords

AI generated
lawful termination of tenancy landlord own use housing shortage justification tenant eviction order vacating premises obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
S. 10 of the Tenancy Act 1973
Art. 17 of the Tenancy Act 1973
AI generated
appeal_1974_helsinki__123
Tenant's appeal dismissed because landlord failed to challenge termination grounds within three months, rendering the termination ineffective under Housing Law.
appeal_1974_helsinki__25
Court dismissed tenant's claim that landlord's termination was illegal due to lack of harm to other residents.
appeal_1984_helsinki__431
Court ruled a lease clause requiring tenant death before landlord death invalid as unreasonable.
appeal_1974_helsinki__19
Tenant's right to terminate lease for personal use after spouse's death upheld against landlord's appeal.
appeal_1978_helsinki__301
Court dismissed tenant's appeal, ruling consecutive fixed-term leases without notice constitute implied termination.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A:n Helsingin AO:lle 12.2.1974 jätetyn haastehakemuksen ja B:lle saman kuun 20 päivänä tiedoksi toimitetun haasteen nojalla ajamasta kanteesta AO on tuomiossaan 29.3.1974 lausunut, että A oli 1.1.1973 irtisanonut hänen ja B:n välisen vuokrasopimuksen päättymään 30.6.1973 ja ilmoittanut irtisanomisen syyksi, että hän tarvitsi huoneiston omaan käyttöönsä. Sen vuoksi ja kun irtisanominen oli tapahtunut laillisesti eikä B ollut määräajassa vastustanut irtisanomisen perustetta sekä koska vuokrasuhteen, huomioon ottaen että häätötoimenpiteisiin oli Helsingin seudulla vallitsevaan vuokra-asuntojen niukkuuteen nähden ryhdytty kohtuulliseksi katsottavassa ajassa vuokrasopimuksen irtisanomisesta, ei voitu katsoa uusiutuneen, AO on velvoittanut B:n muuttamaan.

B haki muutosta.

HO: Ei muutosta.

Läsnä: af Hällström - Seppälä - Mäkelä - Wiias - Pohjola

ES.