Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HO 02.04.1971 57/71 AI generated

Court dismissed tenant's claim for permanent security interest in water rights and pipe construction on landlord's land.

Case Number Vaasan HO 02.04.1971 57/71
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court of appeal dismissed the tenant's appeal against a district court decision refusing to grant a security interest for water rights and pipe construction. The tenant argued that the landlord had granted rights to take water and build necessary pipes on the landlord's land, requesting a permanent security interest under the relevant property law section. The court upheld the lower court's ruling, determining the rights did not meet the legal threshold for a permanent security interest.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Kiinnityslain 1 §; The court held that rights to take water and construct necessary pipes on another's land do not constitute a property right sufficient for a permanent security interest.

Keywords

AI generated
security interest water rights property law tenant rights permanent attachment landlord liability property possession

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Kiinnityslain 1 §

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KKO:1934-II-402
KKO:1934-II-402, KKO:1941-II-123, KKO:1941-I-11
KKO:1941-II-123
KKO:1934-II-402, KKO:1941-II-123, KKO:1941-I-11
KKO:1941-I-11
KKO:1934-II-402, KKO:1941-II-123, KKO:1941-I-11
AI generated
appeal_1970_vaasa__x261
Court allows sale of harvest despite security deposit, ruling it not a prohibited transfer under enforcement law.
appeal_1977_helsinki__37
Court dismisses tenant's claim for rent increase as landlord's investment and market value justify current rate.
appeal_1975_helsinki__130
Tenant's eviction claim dismissed for lack of evidence on necessity and breach of lease terms.
appeal_1974_helsinki__66
Tenant eviction denied because landlord failed to disclose official housing status in lease contract.
appeal_1978_helsinki__301
Court dismissed tenant's appeal, ruling consecutive fixed-term leases without notice constitute implied termination.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

H oli K:n tuomiokunnan tuomarille antamassaan hakemuksessa lausunut, että M oli vuokrasopimuksella myöntänyt hänelle oikeuden ottaa vettä M:n omistamalla tilalla olevasta lähteestä ja rakentaa veden juoksuttamista varten tarpeellisen putken M:n omistaman tilan maalle sekä pyytänyt kiinnityksen vahvistamista sanottuun tilaan H:lle vakuudeksi kysymyksessä olevan oikeuden pysyväisyydestä. Tuomari on päätöksellään, koskei oikeus veden ottamiseen ja sen juoksuttamista varten tarpeellisen putken rakentamiseen ollut sen laatuinen, että sen vakuudeksi KiinA:n 1 §:n nojalla voitiin myöntää kiinnitys, hylännyt hakemuksen.

Hovioikeus, jonne H valitti, pysytti tuomarin päätöksen.

Ks. KKO:1934-II-402, KKO:1941-II-123, KKO:1941-I-11

Zitting-Rautiala: Esineoikeuden oppikirja, s. 122

Lainvoimainen