Court holds that using a forged name on one document and a forged transfer certificate on another constitutes a single forgery offense.

The court of appeal upheld the conviction for one count of forgery against a defendant who used a fake name on a transfer certificate and issued a forged transfer document. The prosecution argued that these acts, though involving separate documents, were part of a continuous scheme to defraud. The court agreed that the intent and execution of the fraud were unified, merging the distinct acts into a single criminal offense.