Vaasan HO 21.03.1967
AI generated
Appeal against public prosecutor's request for indictment dismissed due to lack of examination.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe public prosecutor sought a change to the district court's decision after submitting an indictment request. The court of appeal did not examine the appeal and declared it legally ineffective. Consequently, the original decision regarding the indictment request remained in force without further review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedLainvoimainen päätös; The court of appeal must examine appeals against district court decisions and cannot simply declare them ineffective without substantive review.
Keywords
AI generated
public prosecutor
indictment request
district court
court of appeal
legal effectiveness
procedural review
appeal dismissal
Related Decisions
AI generatedappeal_1966_vaasa__x694
Prosecutor's use of a substitute lawyer caused the court of appeal to dismiss the appeal.
appeal_1980_eastern-finland__1529
Appeal dismissed because prosecutor only requested application of a specific sentencing rule, not a change in conviction outcome.
appeal_1974_vaasa__49
Prosecutor disqualified for lack of impartiality when acting as private plaintiff's lawyer in traffic case.
appeal_1981_kouvola__971
Court allows concurrent crimes sentencing credit for time lost due to detention in a prior case.
kko-precedent_2010_78
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding judge's impartiality due to lack of objective justification for bias concerns.
Full text
Syyttäjä oli, annettuaan toiselle syyttäjälle syytepyynnön ja tämän sen perusteella ajettua raastuvanoikeudessa syytettä, hakenut muutosta raastuvanoikeuden päätökseen.
Valitusta ei tutkittu.
Lainvoimainen