Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HO 28.04.1967 AI generated

Ministry's claim for return of property dismissed as no legal interest exists since debt was already collected.

Case Number Vaasan HO 28.04.1967
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Ministry of Finance's request for the return of property was rejected because the asset in question had already been collected from the debtor. The Ministry argued the property was insignificant, but the court found no legal interest in the matter since the debt was satisfied. Consequently, the claim was dismissed without further examination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ulosottolain voimaanpanemisesta annetun asetuksen 29 §:n mukainen takaisinsaantivaatimus jätetään tutkimatta, jos velan saaminen on jo tapahtunut eikä ministeriöllä ole oikeussuojan tarvetta.

Keywords

AI generated
collection law enforcement property return claim legal interest requirement state debt recovery administrative procedure dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ulosottolain voimaanpanemisesta annetun asetuksen 29 §
AI generated
appeal_1982_eastern-finland__1724
Court dismissed seizure claim as it violated the prohibition on seizing movable property for enforcement.
kko-precedent_2001_20
Supreme Court allows seizure without prior notice when execution risk is endangered by debtor's non-cooperation.
kko-precedent_2012_34
Supreme Court allows third party's appeal costs against state when seizure lacks sufficient legal basis.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2021:23
Supreme Court allows recovery of overpaid education funds after administrative decision interrupts statute of limitations.
appeal_1984_eastern-finland__526
Court dismissed claim to cancel land area assessment as it was a non-taxable subsidy.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Valtiovarainministeriön ulosottolain voimaanpanemisesta annetun asetuksen 29 §:n mukainen takaisinsaantivaatimus jätetty tutkimatta, koska ministeriö oli ilmoittanut, että se omaisuus, jota koskevaa kauppaa ministeriö oli vaatinut selitettäväksi merkityksettömäksi, oli ulosmitattu ministeriön kysymyksessä olevasta saatavasta, eikä ministeriöllä näin ollen ollut oikeussuojan tarvetta.

Lainvoimainen