Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HO 09.06.1967 AI generated

Creditor's appeal to bankruptcy estate by sole manager deemed inadmissible, case dismissed for lack of legal standing.

Case Number Vaasan HO 09.06.1967
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The creditor filed an appeal against the bankruptcy estate, which was accepted by the sole manager acting as the estate's only operator. The court determined that the bankruptcy estate had not been legally summoned in this manner, rendering the creditor's claim procedurally invalid. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without further examination due to the lack of proper legal standing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 24 of the Bankruptcy Act 1967; The creditor's appeal to the bankruptcy estate by the sole manager is inadmissible if the estate was not legally summoned, resulting in dismissal of the case.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy estate sole manager legal standing procedural dismissal creditor appeal summons validity bankruptcy proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 24 of the Bankruptcy Act 1967
AI generated
kko-precedent_1994_128
Supreme Court dismisses guarantee claim as premature when bankruptcy is suspended due to lack of assets.
kko-precedent_1993_14
Supreme Court declares debt clear and non-disputed under bankruptcy rules, allowing asset seizure despite prior lawsuit.
kko-precedent_1987_108
Supreme Court dismisses claim that convicted debtor must pay bankruptcy trustee court costs.
kko-precedent_1988_111
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when bankruptcy administrator accepts full payment from debtor, preventing funds from joining the bankruptcy estate.
kko-other_2010_2398
Bankruptcy trustee's duty to disclose assets suspended when accused of serious fraud.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Konkurssissa valvotun saatavan vahvistamista koskevassa jutussa kantajana ollut velkoja oli haastetta konkurssipesälle tiedoksi annettaessa itse konkurssipesän puolesta sen ainoana toimitsijamiehenä ottanut haasteen vastaan. Konkurssipesän ei katsottu tulleen laillisesti haastetuksi, minkä vuoksi kanne jätettiin tutkimatta.

KKO:n ratkaisu:

Päätös 20.9.1967: ei muutoksenhakulupaa