Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HO 04.01.1967 AI generated

Court of Appeal voids apartment company resolution to take property after shareholder's bankruptcy to protect creditors' rights.

Case Number Vaasan HO 04.01.1967
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal in Vaasa declared the apartment company's resolution to take over a unit void. The company had taken this action after shareholder A entered bankruptcy and failed to pay rent on his shares. The court ruled that the resolution could not be binding because it would infringe upon the rights of A's bankruptcy estate and other creditors.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki 1093/1967 10 §; Laki 1093/1967 11 §: A resolution by an apartment company to take possession of a unit after a shareholder's bankruptcy is void if it infringes upon the rights of the bankruptcy estate or other creditors.

Keywords

AI generated
apartment company resolution shareholder bankruptcy bankruptcy estate rights creditor protection void corporate decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki 1093/1967 10 §
Laki 1093/1967 11 §
AI generated
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:38
Supreme Court declares assembly room takeover invalid due to minor breach of bylaws and equal treatment issues.
kko-precedent_1993_36
Shareholder's loan claim dismissed because capital maintenance rules require valid security for shareholder loans.
kko-precedent_1995_173
Tenant's right to occupy apartment continues after landlord's company enters bankruptcy due to lease validity.
kko-precedent_1994_38
Supreme Court allows apartment company to enforce late management takeover despite owner paying arrears after resolution.
kko-precedent_2017_22
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where minor violation of age restriction in co-op rules lacks sufficient grounds for eviction.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A oli joutunut konkurssitilaan, ja sen jälkeen asunto-osakeyhtiön yhtiökokous oli sen johdosta, että A oli jättänyt maksamatta yhtiössä omistamiensa osakkeiden perusteella hallitsemastaan huoneistosta suoritettavia erääntyneitä vuokravastikkeita, päättänyt ottaa mainitun huoneiston yhtiön hoidettavaksi.

B:n, joka oli sittemmin toimitetussa panttihuutokaupassa ostanut kysymyksessä olevat osakkeet, vetokanteesta hovioikeus on katsonut, ettei asunto-osakeyhtiön yhtiökokous ole enää A:n konkurssin alkamisen jälkeen voinut, loukkaamatta A:n konkurssipesän muiden velkojien oikeutta, sitovasti tehdä puheena olevaa päätöstä huoneiston haltuun ottamisesta. Sen vuoksi hovioikeus on julistanut yhtiökokouksen päätöksen vaikutuksettomaksi.

Lainvoimainen