Prosecutor's use of a substitute lawyer caused the court of appeal to dismiss the appeal.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe prosecutor, dissatisfied with a lower court decision, appointed a substitute lawyer (ylikonstaapeli) to represent them before the court of appeal. The court of appeal in Vaasa declined to examine the appeal, citing the procedural irregularity. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as the court deemed the appointment of a substitute lawyer by the prosecutor invalid for this purpose.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedLaki syyttäjästä 1940 (1026/1940) 11 §; 19 §: A prosecutor may not appoint a substitute lawyer to represent them in court proceedings; such an appointment renders the appeal inadmissible.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Syyttäjänä toiminut nimismies ilmoittanut tyytymättömyyttä kihlakunnanoikeuden päätökseen käyttämällä ylikonstaapelia asiamiehenään. Hovioikeus jättänyt jutun tutkittavakseen ottamatta.
Lainvoimainen