Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HO 09.12.1966 AI generated

Appeal against detention refusal dismissed; client accepted sentence and began serving it.

Case Number Vaasan HO 09.12.1966
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the guardian's appeal against the decision refusing to detain the client. The client had already accepted the original decision and commenced serving the imposed sentence. Consequently, the court found no grounds to overturn the refusal of detention.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki vankilavapauttamisesta ja vankilavankiuden lyhentämisestä (1966); If a detainee accepts the decision and begins serving the sentence, an appeal by the guardian to refuse detention is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
detention refusal appeal guardian objection sentence commencement inadmissible appeal prison detention law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki vankilavapauttamisesta ja vankilavankiuden lyhentämisestä (1966)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
VaaHO 30.4.1965 D:RD1965/174
AI generated
appeal_1982_eastern-finland__1332
Court of Appeal quites appeal court's sentence for failing to hear defendant and counsel personally.
kko-other_2007_1743
Supreme Court dismisses claim for recovery of guardian's debt due to statute of limitations expiration.
kko-precedent_2015_55
Supreme Court allows appeal re-hearing because defendant could not notify court of hospitalization due to lack of summons.
kko-precedent_1997_74
Supreme Court dismisses appeal and remands case for retrial due to failure to notify defendant of prosecutor's appeal.
kko-precedent_2015_15
Supreme Court reverses appeal dismissal for failure to hold oral hearing on sentencing and guilt issues.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Alaikäinen (20-vuotias) vangittu henkilö tyytyi raastuvanoikeuden päätökseen ja alkoi kärsiä hänelle tuomittua rangaistusta. Holhooja ilmoitti tyytymättömyyttä päätökseen ja haki siihen muutosta. Holhoojan muutoksenhakemus on tutkittu.

Samoin VaaHO:n päätös D:RD1965/174, A:30.4.1965

Lainvoimainen