Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HAO 02.03.2021 21/0030/3 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal against environmental authority's decision to approve expanded animal protection facility.

Case Number Vaasan HAO 02.03.2021 21/0030/3
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Vaasa dismissed the applicant's appeal against the environmental authority's decision to approve an expansion of an animal protection facility. The authority found the proposed expansion compliant with the Animal Protection Act and the minimum distance requirements set by the Ministry Decree. The court upheld the decision, ruling that the authority correctly applied the relevant regulations regarding facility expansion and safety distances.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ympäristönsuojelulain 115 a §; Eläinsuoja-asetus 2 § ja 3 §: The administrative authority's decision to approve an expansion of an animal protection facility based on statutory minimum distance requirements is valid if the decision is made in accordance with the law and the specific regulations governing such facilities.

Keywords

AI generated
animal protection facility expansion approval minimum distance requirements environmental authority decision administrative appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ympäristönsuojelulain 115 a §
Eläinsuoja-asetus 2 §
Eläinsuoja-asetus 3 §
AI generated
admin_2021_vaasa__131
Administrative court dismissed appeal against environmental secretary's decision on animal protection facility expansion distances.
kho-other_2015_3784
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses complaints against an environmental permit for quarrying operations in Finland.
kho-other_2016_592
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed environmental permit appeals regarding quarry operating hours and noise limits.
kho-other_2017_3595
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against general plan restriction on wind farm noise zones. Court held plan's noise limits constitute mandatory construction restrictions under planning law.
admin_2019_vaasa__249
Administrative court dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Finland.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kunnan ympäristönsuojeluviranomainen oli valituksenalaisella päätöksellään hyväksynyt ympäristönsuojelulain 115 a §:ssä tarkoitetun ilmoituksen eläinsuojan toiminnan laajentamisesta poiketen samalla ilmoituksenvaraisista eläinsuojista annetun valtioneuvoston asetuksen (138/2019, eläinsuoja-asetus) 2 §:ssä tarkoitetuista vähimmäisetäisyyksistä mainitun asetuksen 3 §:n nojalla.

Lainvoimainen