Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Hämeenlinnan HAO 02.04.2020 20/0321/2 AI generated

Family members' late residence permit application dismissed; late submission excusable only if special circumstances exist.

Case Number Hämeenlinnan HAO 02.04.2020 20/0321/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the family members' application for a residence permit based on family ties after the three-month deadline expired. The applicants argued that special circumstances excused their late filing, but the court found no evidence of such factors. Consequently, the application was rejected because the statutory requirement for a timely application was not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ulkomaalaislaki 114 § 4 momentti; Ulkomaalaislaki 39 § 1 momentti: The three-month deadline for submitting a residence permit application based on family ties is strict, and special circumstances must be proven to excuse a late submission.

Keywords

AI generated
residence permit application family ties basis late submission deadline excusable delay administrative law principle

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ulkomaalaislaki 39 § 1 momentti
Ulkomaalaislaki 114 § 1 momentti 1 kohta
Ulkomaalaislaki 114 § 4 momentti

Cited Case Law

AI generated
C-380/17 K ja B v. Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
AI generated
ECLI:FI:KHO:2021:98
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal; residence permit denied due to lack of financial support and late application.
kho-precedent_2011_43
Supreme Administrative Court allows residence permit based on family reunification with third-party financial guarantee.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2021:99
Supreme Administrative Court allows asylum family member residence permit by excusing late filing due to objective circumstances.
insurance_2010_329-2009
Insurance Court quashes Social Security Board's dismissal of late appeal due to failure to inform client of duty to explain delay.
kho-precedent_2009_35
Supreme Administrative Court allows residence permit for Afghan family members based on total dependency despite broken family ties.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pakolaisen perheenjäsenet olivat hakeneet oleskelulupaa perhesiteen perusteella ulkomaalaislain 114 §:n 4 momentissa säädetyn kolmen kuukauden määräajan päättymisen jälkeen. Asiassa oli kysymys siitä, voitiinko toimeentuloedellytyksestä poiketa heidän kohdallaan sillä perusteella, että asian erityiset olosuhteet olivat tehneet hakemusten myöhäisestä jättämisestä anteeksiannettavaa.

Ulkomaalaislaki 39 § 1 mom

Ulkomaalaislaki 114 § 1 mom 1 kohta

Ulkomaalaislaki 114 § 4 mom

Euroopan unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio asiassa C-380/17 (K ja B v. Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie)

Asian ovat ratkaisseet hallinto-oikeuden jäsenet Anneli Aura, Jussi-Pekka Lajunen, joka on myös esitellyt asian, ja Susanna Aspelund (t).