Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Hämeenlinnan HAO 12.06.2018 18/0268/1 AI generated

Holiday pay during employment is not a one-time benefit but distributable income under social assistance law.

Case Number Hämeenlinnan HAO 12.06.2018 18/0268/1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court ruled that holiday pay received during employment constitutes distributable income under the Social Assistance Act. The court found that the payment was not a one-time benefit but could be allocated across multiple months based on its purpose. Consequently, the applicant's claim to exclude this income from their social assistance calculation was upheld.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki toimeentulotuesta 15 § 2 mom; Holiday pay received during employment is not a one-time benefit but constitutes distributable income that may be allocated across multiple months for social assistance calculations.

Keywords

AI generated
Social Assistance Act Holiday Pay Distributable Income Employment Period One-Time Benefit Income Allocation Administrative Court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki toimeentulotuesta 15 § 2 mom
Laki toimeentulotuesta 15 § 2 mom
AI generated
kko-precedent_1988_103
Supreme Court allows delayed pay claim when computer error and employer's lack of knowledge caused underpayment.
admin_1999_turku-and-pori-county__47
Court allows partial consideration of lump-sum vacation pay in two-month means-tested benefit calculations.
labour_2008_29
Labor court dismisses claim for delayed severance pay as it was paid promptly per collective agreement.
labour_2006_46
Labor court dismisses claim for double or triple pay during regular work hours in stoppage periods.
labour_1989_56
Labor court dismisses union claim that annual leave pay requires employment continuation after leave ends.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Päätöslyhennelmä

Työsuhteen kestäessä palkanmaksun yhteydessä maksettu lomaraha ei ollut toimeentulotuesta annetun lain 15 §:n 2 momentissa tarkoitettu kertaluonteinen eikä sen saamisen peruste tai käyttötarkoitus huomioon ottaen sellainen tulo, joka voitiin tämän lainkohdan perusteella jakaa eriin otettavaksi huomioon useampina kuukausina.

Laki toimeentulotuesta 15 § 2 mom

Ratkaisijakokoonpano

Asian ovat ratkaisseet hallinto-oikeustuomarit Minna Koskinen, Johanna Virmavirta ja Jaakko Sivonen. Asian esittelijä Anette Ståhl-Aalto.