Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Turun HAO 17.10.2017 17/0569/2 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed social assistance claim against illegal resident due to lack of permanent residence status.

Case Number Turun HAO 17.10.2017 17/0569/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Turku dismissed the applicant's social assistance claim after the Social Insurance Institution rejected it, citing the applicant's illegal residence. The applicant argued for support despite having a rejected residence permit and a temporary stay status, while the opposing party maintained that eligibility requires lawful residence. The court ruled that the statutory conditions for social assistance were not met because the applicant did not reside in Finland in the manner required by the Social Assistance Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki toimeentulotuesta 1 § 1 mom; 2 §; 14 a §: Social assistance is not payable to an individual residing in Finland illegally or temporarily without the requisite legal status.

Keywords

AI generated
social assistance eligibility illegal residence status temporary residence Social Assistance Act constitutional residence rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki toimeentulotuesta 1 § 1 mom
Laki toimeentulotuesta 1 § 1 mom, 2 § ja 14 a §
Laki toimeentulotuesta 2 §
Laki toimeentulotuesta 14 a §
Suomen perustuslaki 19 § 1 mom
Suomen perustuslaki 19 § 1 mom
AI generated
admin_2018_helsinki__446
Administrative court dismissed asylum seeker's basic income support claim due to temporary residence status.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2025:75
Court dismisses appeal as stable income requirement for long-term resident status applies to asylum seekers too.
admin_2005_helsinki__1849
Administrative Court dismisses deportation and residence permit appeals, upholding expulsion despite pending residence case.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2021:102
Supreme Administrative Court allows residence permit despite prior deportation for drug crimes, requiring full balance of family ties and child's best interests.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2023:17
Entry ban alone cannot deny work residence permit if applicant remains in country under EU return directive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kansaneläkelaitos oli 3.1.2017 hylännyt X:n toimeentulotukihakemuksen ja Kela Oikaisuvaatimuskeskus oli 28.3.2017 hylännyt X:n oikaisuvaatimuksen. Oikaisuvaatimuskeskuksen päätöksen perustelujen mukaan X:n katsottiin oleskelevan maassa laittomasti, koska hänen oleskelulupansa oli hylätty. Päätös X:n maasta poistamisesta oli täytäntöönpanokelpoinen ja hänet oli määrätty maahantulokieltoon 1.12.2016 - 1.12.2018. X:n oleskelun Suomessa katsottiin olevan tilapäistä. X:n toimeentulotukihakemus hylättiin, koska hänen ei voitu katsoa oleskelevan toimeentulotukilain edellyttämällä tavalla Suomessa.

Suomen perustuslaki 19 § 1 mom

Laki toimeentulotuesta 1 § 1 mom, 2 § ja 14 a §