Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HAO 14.09.2017 17/0811/3 AI generated

Legal aid denied to asylum seeker for alleged abuse of process regarding final protection application.

Case Number Helsingin HAO 14.09.2017 17/0811/3
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's claim for legal aid regarding his final asylum application. The Office of Legal Aid had refused assistance, citing the applicant's history as evidence of abuse of process. The court upheld this decision, finding no error in the assessment of the applicant's conduct.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Oikeusapulaki 1 § 1 mom; 7 § 1 mom; Ulkomaalaislaki 9 § 1 mom: Legal aid may be denied when an applicant's history demonstrates an abuse of the asylum procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
legal aid denial abuse of process asylum application Office of Legal Aid procedural history

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Oikeusapulaki 1 § 1 mom
Oikeusapulaki 1 § 1 mom ja 7 § 1 mom
Oikeusapulaki 7 § 1 mom
Ulkomaalaislaki 9 § 1 mom
Ulkomaalaislaki 9 § 1 mom
Directive 2013/32/EU
AI generated
admin_2005_helsinki__1386
Administrative court grants asylum seeker retroactive legal aid when prior decisions lack final legal force.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2019:164
Permanent residence permit appeal jurisdiction determined by residence location, not asylum status, under new 193 § of Aliens Act.
kho-precedent_2017_138
Appeal court quashes asylum rejection due to failure to inform applicant of father's interview transcript before decision.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2020:102
Supreme Administrative Court rejects appeal permission because new evidence submitted only at this stage is not a special weighty reason under the Aliens Act.
admin_1986_aland-county__156
Legal aid for foreign fatherhood proceedings denied due to lack of local residence and late application.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oikeusaputoimisto ei ollut myöntänyt ulkomaalaiselle A:lle oikeusapua Maahanmuuttovirastossa vireillä olleeseen, kesäkuussa 2017 vireille pantuun hänen viimeisimpään turvapaikkahakemusasiaansa, vaan oli katsonut muun ohella A:n hakemushistoriaan viitaten, että asian ajaminen olisi oikeuden väärinkäyttämistä.

Oikeusapulaki 1 § 1 mom ja 7 § 1 mom

Ulkomaalaislaki 9 § 1 mom

Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston direktiivi 2013/32/EU kansainvälisen suojelun myöntämistä tai poistamista koskevista yhteisistä menettelyistä (uudelleenlaadittu)

Asian ovat ratkaisseet hallinto-oikeuden jäsenet Vesa Heikkilä, Outi Siimes (t) ja Jyri Vesanto

Asian esittelijä Emmi Aakula.

Päätös on lainvoimainen.