Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HAO 28.05.2015 15/0400/5 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal against municipal contract approval for compensation payment in exchange for increased building rights.

Case Number Helsingin HAO 28.05.2015 15/0400/5
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the appeal against the municipal council's approval of a contract between the municipality and X Oyj regarding compensation for increased building rights. The company sought additional building area on a plot where existing rights were nearly fully utilized, and the contract stipulated a payment of 540,000 euros to the municipality. The court upheld the decision because the compensation arrangement complied with the relevant provisions of the Planning and Building Act and the Local Government Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Kuntalaki 135 § 2 mom; 146 §; Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 91a §; 91b §: A contract between a municipality and a company for compensation in exchange for increased building rights is valid if it complies with statutory requirements regarding land use and financial compensation.

Keywords

AI generated
municipal contract approval building rights compensation Planning and Building Act Local Government Act administrative appeal dismissal land use planning public compensation scheme

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Kuntalaki (410/2015) 135 § 2 mom
Kuntalaki (410/2015) 135 § 2 mom ja 146 §
Kuntalaki (410/2015) 146 §
Suomen perustuslaki 6 §
Hallintolaki 6 §
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 91a §
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 91b §

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO 2565/16 10.6.2016
KHO 2565/16 10.6.2016. Päätöksen lopputulosta ei muuteta.
AI generated
kho-precedent_2016_89
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed agreement as ultra vires due to missing planning procedure requirements under Building Act.
admin_1991_uusimaa-county__643
Administrative court dismissed appeal against city council's cost compensation decision under private construction agreement.
kho-precedent_2014_158
Supreme Court held municipality competent to grant exception for replacing holiday home with permanent residence under planning law.
kho-precedent_2004_87
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against zoning plan approval and land use agreement acceptance.
admin_2000_turku__481
Transfer tax court ruled construction costs paid by seller are part of land price.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kaupunginhallitus oli hyväksynyt kaupungin ja X Oyj:n välisen, kunnallistekniikan rakentamissopimukseksi otsikoidun sopimuksen. Sopimus liittyi vireillä olevaan X Oyj:n poikkeamishakemukseen, jolla yhtiö oli hakenut omistamalleen tontille 9 000 k-m

lisää rakennusoikeutta yritystoiminnan varastotilojen laajentamista varten. Tontille asemakaavassa osoitettu noin 44 000 k-m

:n suuruinen rakennusoikeus oli jo käytetty lähes kokonaan. Sopimuksen mukaan

X Oyj maksaa kaupungille yhdyskuntarakentamisen ulkoisen kunnallistekniikan korvauksena lisääntyneestä rakennusoikeudesta 540 000 euroa.

Kuntalaki (410/2015) 135 § 2 mom ja 146 §

Suomen perustuslaki 6 §

Hallintolaki 6 §

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 91a ja 91b §

Asian ovat ratkaisseet hallinto-oikeuden jäsenet Markku Setälä, Jaana Moilanen (t) ja Minna Ruuskanen.

Asian esittelijä Minna Ruuskanen.

KHO 2565/16 10.6.2016. Päätöksen lopputulosta ei muuteta.