Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HAO 08.04.2014 14/0252/5 AI generated

Fire safety inspection requires building permit for compartmentalization; administrative court quashed order lacking permit.

Case Number Helsingin HAO 08.04.2014 14/0252/5
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court quashed the fire safety inspector's order to compartmentalize storage areas in a repair shop. The inspector mandated separation under the Fire Safety Act, but the owner argued a building permit was unnecessary. The court ruled that compartmentalization constitutes a structural change requiring a building permit before implementation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Pelastuslaki 4 § 1 ja 2 mom, 9 § 1 ja 2 mom, 78 §, 81 § 1, 2 ja 3 mom; Structural modifications to storage facilities for fire safety purposes require a building permit.

Keywords

AI generated
Fire Safety Act Building Permit Requirement Compartmentalization Administrative Court Fire Safety Inspection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Pelastuslaki 4 § 1 ja 2 mom
Pelastuslaki 4 § 1 ja 2 mom, 9 § 1 ja 2 mom, 78 §, 81 § 1, 2 ja 3 mom
Pelastuslaki 9 § 1 ja 2 mom
Pelastuslaki 78 §
Pelastuslaki 81 § 1, 2 ja 3 mom
AI generated
admin_1987_kuopio-county__132
Fire inspector's repair order is not a reviewable administrative decision under Finnish law.
kko-precedent_2010_85
Supreme Court dismisses fraud charges but upholds embezzlement conviction for corporate asset misappropriation.
admin_1990_hame-county__646
Fire safety order not final; administrative court dismisses appeal as it lacks finality for review.
admin_2010_hameenlinna__161
Administrative court quashes safety center's refusal of competence certificate due to vague qualification requirements violating constitutional proportionality.
admin_1988_mikkeli-county__924
Administrative court dismissed appeal against fire chief's orders under Fire and Rescue Act s. 47 despite no threat.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Autojen korjaus- ja huoltotoimintaa harjoittavan X Oy:n tiloissa oli toimitettu jälkipalotarkastus. Palotarkastaja oli pelastuslain 81 §:n nojalla määrännyt, että rakennuksen huolto- ja varastotilat tuli palo-osastoida toisistaan ja palo-osastoinnin toteuttamiseksi tuli hakea rakennuslupaa.

Hallinto-oikeus kumosi korjausmääräystä koskevan päätöksen.

Pelastuslaki 4 § 1 ja 2 mom, 9 § 1 ja 2 mom, 78 §, 81 § 1, 2 ja 3 mom

Asian ovat ratkaisseet hallinto-oikeuden jäsenet Markku Setälä, Ilkka Hartikainen (t) ja Tuula Pääkkönen.

Asian esittelijä Tuula Pääkkönen.

Lainvoimainen.