Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Rovaniemen HAO 04.01.2013 13/0008/1 AI generated

Administrative court allows reindeer reduction by percentage of herd size as legally compliant method.

Case Number Rovaniemen HAO 04.01.2013 13/0008/1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Finland allowed the Sami reindeer herding community's decision to reduce reindeer by a percentage of the remaining herd rather than strictly by the previous year's quota. The community argued this method ensures proportional reduction among partners, while the opposing party contended it violated the mandatory herd-size ratio requirement. The court ruled that the statutory requirement for proportional reduction is satisfied by any method that maintains the relative share of each partner's herd.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Poronhoitolaki 22 §:n 1 momentti; The reduction of reindeer herds must be proportional to the partners' herd sizes, and this requirement is met by any method ensuring the relative share of each partner's herd remains consistent.

Keywords

AI generated
reindeer herding law mandatory herd reduction proportional share requirement Sami reindeer community administrative court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Reindeer Herding Act 22 § 1
AI generated
insurance_2009_2134-2008
Insurance court allowed claimant to deduct lump-sum work injury compensation monthly from pension instead of one-time reduction.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2022:119
Reindeer herding council's outdoor counting decision dismissed due to failure to ensure equal treatment of shareholders.
kho-precedent_2012_109
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed tax deduction claim where spouses held work housing at different times in same year.
kho-precedent_2017_143
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed VAT assessment due to lack of statutory rules for foundation construction indirect costs calculation.
insurance_1982_11858-1980
Insurance court dismissed claim for retroactive pension reduction correction due to statutory time limits.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asiassa oli kysymys poronhoitolain 22 §:n 1 momentissa tarkoitetusta porojen pakollisesta vähentämisestä, jonka tulee tapahtua paliskunnan osakkaiden porojen määrän mukaisessa suhteessa.

Vähennettävien porojen määrä oli paliskunnassa aikaisemmin laskettu prosenttiosuutena kunkin poronomistajan edellisen poronhoitovuoden poroluettelon mukaisesta eloporoluvusta.

Poronhoitovuoden 2012 - 2013 osalta paliskunta päätti, että vähennettävien porojen määrä lasketaan prosenttiosuutena erotuksessa aitaan tulleista poroista. Hallinto-oikeus katsoi, että myös paliskunnan päättämällä tavalla suoritettu porojen vähentäminen tapahtuu poronhoitolain edellyttämällä tavalla osakkaiden porojen määrän mukaisessa suhteessa.

Poronhoitolaki 22 §

Lainvoimainen