Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Kuopion HAO 10.06.2013 13/0223/3 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed parking permit appeal due to lack of standing under municipal and administrative procedure laws.

Case Number Kuopion HAO 10.06.2013 13/0223/3
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the Regional Administration Board's appeal regarding a parking permit decision in the city center. The Board argued it had standing as a party, a municipal member, or a supervised authority, but the court found no basis for any of these claims. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the Board lacked the necessary legal standing to challenge the administrative act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Kuntalaki 92 § 1 momentti; Kuntalaki 4 §; Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 § 2 momentti: An administrative body lacks standing to appeal a decision unless it is a party, a member of the municipality, or a supervised authority acting to protect public interest.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative standing municipal law administrative procedure regional administration board parking permit public interest legal capacity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Kuntalaki 92 § 1 momentti
Kuntalaki 92 § 1 momentti
Kuntalaki 4 §
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 § 2 momentti
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 § 2 momentti
AI generated
admin_2015_turku__61
Administrative court dismisses appeal due to lack of jurisdiction over labor disputes and standing of union representative.
kho-precedent_2009_93
Court dismisses appointment without public tender as violating public law equality principles.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2018:1
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal by municipality and residents' association against Traffic Agency's noise restriction denial. The court ruled that the decision affects their rights and must be reconsidered.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2017:201
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; unionized official's wage dispute belongs to labor court, not administrative court.
kho-precedent_2016_23
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal for provider removal from service voucher list under municipal law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Tekninen lautakunta oli päättänyt pysäköinnin sallimisesta kaupungin keskustassa aluehallintoviraston toimitilojen kohdalla olevalla katuosuudella.

Hallinto-oikeus jätti aluehallintoviraston valituksen tutkimatta puuttuvan valitusoikeuden vuoksi. Hallinto-oikeus arvioi valitusoikeutta kuntalain 92 §:n mukaisen asianosaisuuden ja kuntalain 4 §:n mukaisen kunnan jäsenyyden sekä hallintolainkäyttölain 6 §:n mukaisen viranomaisen valitusoikeuden kannalta. Hallinto-oikeus katsoi, että aluehallintovirastolla ei ollut valitusoikeutta asianosaisena eikä kunnan jäsenenä eikä myöskään viranomaisen valvottavana olevan julkisen edun perusteella.

Kuntalaki 92 § 1 momentti

Kuntalaki 4 §

Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 § 2 momentti

Asian ovat ratkaisseet hallinto-oikeustuomarit Jukka Hartikainen, Pirjo Salesvuo ja Mirjami Paso. Asian esittelijä hallinto-oikeussihteeri Anu Klemetti.

Lainvoimainen