Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Hämeenlinnan HAO 04.12.2013 13/0752/3 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses appeal as estate partner status is a private law dispute not binding on the registrar.

Case Number Hämeenlinnan HAO 04.12.2013 13/0752/3
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the registrar's confirmation that no partners exist in the deceased's estate. The applicant argued they were a partner, but the court determined the registrar's administrative act did not resolve the substantive private law question of partnership status under the Succession Act. Consequently, the court ruled that any disagreement regarding partner status must be litigated in civil court rather than through administrative review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Succession Act s. 18; Civil Code s. 1600: The registrar's confirmation of estate partner information does not bind parties on private law partnership status, which remains a matter for civil litigation.

Keywords

AI generated
estate partner status administrative court jurisdiction private law dispute succession act provisions civil court competence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Succession Act s. 18
Civil Code s. 1600
AI generated
admin_2018_vaasa__325
Administrative court dismisses appeal by deceased's heir for lack of standing and insufficient estate investigation.
kho-precedent_2016_22
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal because the registrar's certification did not legally resolve heir status. The court held the certification lacked a binding legal decision on heirship. Consequently, the appeal was inadmissible under administrative procedure law.
kho-other_2018_1121
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding wind farm zoning plan due to premature measurement requirements.
kho-precedent_1997_61
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against administrative decision regarding illegal residence permit revocation under TVL Act.
kho-precedent_2006_88
Court dismisses recovery of income support from an undivided inheritance share as not a recoverable income under the Act.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Päätöslyhennelmä

Maistraatti oli vahvistanut perukirjan osakastiedot todeten, että kuolinpesässä ei ole osakkaita.

A, joka katsoi olevansa kuolinpesän osakas, vaati valituksessaan maistraatin tekemän osakastietojen vahvistuksen kumoamista. Hallinto-oikeus jätti valituksen tutkimatta. Hallinto-oikeus totesi, että maistraatti ei ole perukirjan osakastietojen vahvistamista koskevalla hallintotoimellaan kuolinpesään kohdistuvien perhe- ja perintöoikeudellisten oikeuksien haltijoita sitovasti ratkaissut, onko kuolinpesässä perintökaaren 18 luvun 1 §:ssä tarkoitettuja osakkaita. Kuolinpesän osakasasemaa koskeva erimielisyys on yksityisoikeudellinen riita-asia, joka voidaan maistraatin vahvistuksen esteenä olematta saattaa käräjäoikeuden tutkittavaksi ja ratkaistavaksi riita-asian oikeudenkäynnistä säädetyssä järjestyksessä.

Maistraatin toimenpide perukirjan osakastietojen vahvistamisesta ei sisältänyt sellaista ratkaisua, johon voidaan hakea muutosta hallintolainkäytön järjestyksessä.