Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Turun HAO 14.09.2012 12/0575/2 AI generated

Court dismisses claim for additional income support because shoe purchases are covered by existing savings allowance.

Case Number Turun HAO 14.09.2012 12/0575/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the prisoner's claim for additional income support regarding the purchase of running shoes. The court determined that these expenses were already accounted for within the prisoner's existing savings allowance of 99 euros used to calculate basic income support. Consequently, the court ruled that such costs do not justify supplementary assistance under the Income Support Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki toimeentulotuesta 1 § 1 mom; 2 §; 7a §; 7c §: Expenses for personal items like shoes purchased by a prisoner are considered part of the savings allowance if included in the basic income support calculation, thereby precluding claims for additional support.

Keywords

AI generated
income support calculation prisoner savings allowance personal item expenses supplementary assistance denial administrative court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki toimeentulotuesta 1 § 1 mom
Laki toimeentulotuesta 1 § 1 mom
Laki toimeentulotuesta 2 §
Laki toimeentulotuesta 2 §
Laki toimeentulotuesta 7a §
Laki toimeentulotuesta 7a §
Laki toimeentulotuesta 7c §
Laki toimeentulotuesta 7c §
AI generated
kho-precedent_2013_58
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses prisoner's appeal for food allowance exceeding standard prison budget limits.
admin_1996_central-finland-county__652
Prisoner denied food security support due to lack of expenses and unwillingness to work in prison.
admin_1988_central-finland-county__914
Administrative court dismissed prisoner's claim for income support for sports equipment due to existing prison wages.
kko-precedent_2004_128
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; prior detention order expired but new arrest valid due to flight risk.
admin_2002_vaasa__265
Life insurance premiums for loan security are not deductible business expenses under Finnish tax law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Vankeusvanki X:lle oli myönnetty 54,90 euroa perustoimeentulotukea. Tuen perusteena olleessa laskelmassa oli otettu tuloina huomioon X:lle vankilassa tehdystä työstä maksettu 44,10 euroa ja menoina käyttövara 99 euroa.

Hallinto-oikeus katsoi, että X:n vaatemenot eli lenkkitossujen hankinnasta aiheutuvat menot sisältyvät mainittuun laitoksessa asuvan toimeentulotuen perusosaksi tarkoitettuun käyttövaraan, mistä syystä kyseiset menot eivät oikeuta täydentävään toimeentulotukeen.

Laki toimeentulotuesta 1 § 1 mom

Laki toimeentulotuesta 2 §

Laki toimeentulotuesta 7a §

Laki toimeentulotuesta 7c §