Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Turun HAO 15.02.2012 12/0041/1 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal; developer not a party under land use act as project did not affect shared water area.

Case Number Turun HAO 15.02.2012 12/0041/1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Finland dismissed the appellant's appeal regarding a sauna construction project on a holiday apartment site. The appellant, a co-ownership association managing the adjacent shared water area, argued for standing under the Land Use and Construction Act. The court ruled that the project, being structurally and purpose-compliant with the plan and not extending to the shared water area, did not legally require the association to be considered a party with appeal rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslain 192 § 1 mom; A co-ownership association managing a shared water area adjacent to a construction site is not a party entitled to appeal if the project does not extend to that water area and complies with the land use plan.

Keywords

AI generated
standing for appeal shared water area co-ownership association land use plan construction project scope

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 192 § 1 mom
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 192 § 1 mom

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO 1.10.2003 taltio 2343
KHO 1.10.2003 taltio 2343 ja KHO:1982-A-II-35
KHO:1982-A-II-35
KHO 1.10.2003 taltio 2343 ja KHO:1982-A-II-35
AI generated
kko-precedent_1990_176
Supreme Court dismisses municipality's appeal for lack of standing regarding water areas not owned by the municipality.
kho-other_2016_3783
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; lower court upheld water law permit denial due to planning conflicts.
kho-other_2015_392
KHO 17.2.2015/392
kho-other_2018_38
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against water law permit for groundwater recharge tests on groundwater protection area.
kho-other_2014_1358
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against closure of public waterway for military use.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rakennushankkeessa oli kysymys kahden saunan rakentamisesta yhteisökäyttöön tarkoitetulle loma-asuntojen korttelialueelle. Valittajana oleva yhteisalueen osakaskunta hallinnoi rakennuspaikan rantaan rajoittuvaa yhteistä vesialuetta. Hanke oli kerrosalansa ja käyttötarkoituksensa puolesta kaavan mukainen, eikä se miltään osin ulottunut yhteiselle vesialueelle. Hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ettei valittajaa ollut pidettävä asiassa maankäyttö- ja rakennuslain 192 §:n 1 momentissa tarkoitettuna asianosaisena siten, että sillä olisi asiassa valitusoikeus.

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 192 § 1 mom

ks. myös. KHO 1.10.2003 taltio 2343 ja KHO:1982-A-II-35