Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Helsingin HAO 02.11.2012 12/0953/5 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses urgent placement and contact restriction claims under Child Protection Act.

Case Number Helsingin HAO 02.11.2012 12/0953/5
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Finland dismissed the applicant's requests for urgent placement and contact restrictions. The applicant argued that immediate intervention was necessary to protect the child's welfare, while the authorities maintained that existing measures were sufficient. The court found no compelling reason to alter the status quo given the lack of new evidence of imminent danger.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Child Protection Act s. 38(1), s. 63, s. 83(1): The court may issue urgent measures only when there is a clear and immediate threat to the child's well-being that cannot be addressed by existing measures.

Keywords

AI generated
Child Protection Act urgent placement contact restrictions administrative review imminent danger interim measures best interests of child

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Child Protection Act s. 38(1)
Child Protection Act s. 63
Child Protection Act s. 83(1)
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Hallinto-oikeus tutki kiireellistä sijoitusta ja yhteydenpidon rajoittamista koskevista päätöksistä tehdyt väliaikaista määräystä koskevat vaatimukset.

Lastensuojelulaki 38 § 1 mom, 63 § ja 83 § 1 mom