Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HAO 24.02.2012 12/0178/1 AI generated

Foreign worker's residence permit denied due to insufficient income proof during layoff period.

Case Number Helsingin HAO 24.02.2012 12/0178/1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the foreign worker's application for a continued residence permit, ruling that their livelihood was not secured during the layoff period. Although the applicant submitted wage certificates showing a salary increase and vacation pay, the court found these did not prove financial security between the layoff and return to work. Consequently, the police authority was justified in rejecting the permit based on the lack of guaranteed subsistence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ulkomaalaislaki 54 § 1 mom; 72 § 1 ja 4 mom; 73 § 1 mom; 75 § 1 mom; 83 § 1 ja 3 mom: A foreign worker's application for a continued residence permit must be rejected if their livelihood cannot be assured during employment interruptions, even if some financial support was received.

Keywords

AI generated
continued residence permit foreign worker livelihood employment interruption income proof requirement administrative court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ulkomaalaislaki 54 § 1 mom
Ulkomaalaislaki 54 § 1 mom, 72 § 1 ja 4 mom, 73 § 1 mom, 75 § 1 mom, 83 § 1 ja 3 mom
Ulkomaalaislaki 72 § 1
Ulkomaalaislaki 72 § 4 mom
Ulkomaalaislaki 73 § 1 mom
Ulkomaalaislaki 75 § 1 mom
Ulkomaalaislaki 83 § 1
Ulkomaalaislaki 83 § 3 mom
AI generated
insurance_1998_8725-1997
Insurance court denied unemployment benefits when employer bonus was prorated to cover the employment termination period.
kko-precedent_1993_99
Supreme Court allows unpaid salary and severance for employee fired without cause despite result-based pay scheme.
admin_2020_eastern-finland__231
Administrative court allows travel expenses deduction from all income sources under social assistance law.
insurance_1977_5801-1976
Insurance court dismissed pension claim adjustment due to work stoppage not meeting statutory special cause criteria.
insurance_2007_1860-2006
Court dismissed appeal; pension end date is last salary payment date, excluding annual leave pay.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Valituksen yhteydessä oli esitetty palkkatodistuksia, joiden mukaan A:lle oli maksettu lomautuksen jälkeen ajalla 10.3.2010 - 6.2.2011 lomarahoineen yhteensä 17 597,13 euroa ja A:n tuntipalkka oli noussut 9,02 euroon.

Hallinto-oikeus katsoi, että A:n toimeentulo ei kuitenkaan on ollut turvattu lomautuksen aikana 21.9.2009 - 17.2.2010 eikä ennen työhön paluuta 10.3.2010. Koska A:n toimeentulosta edellisen työntekijän oleskeluluvan aikana ei ollut voitu vakuuttua, työlupayksikkö oli voinut mainitsemillaan perusteilla tehdä kielteisen osaratkaisun. Asiassa ei ollut hallinto-oikeudessa esitetty sellaisia seikkoja, joiden nojalla asiaa olisi arvioitava toisin. Poliisilaitoksen oli näin ollen tullut hylätä työntekijän jatko-oleskelulupaa koskeva hakemus.

Ulkomaalaislaki 54 § 1 mom, 72 § 1 ja 4 mom, 73 § 1 mom, 75 § 1 mom, 83 § 1 ja 3 mom

Äänestys 8-3.

KHO:n päätös 9.11.2012 taltionumero 3135: Asia raukeaa