Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HAO 11.10.2011 11/0677/2 AI generated

Court dismisses inheritance transfer tax claim where payment was made to heirs for estate assets.

Case Number Vaasan HAO 11.10.2011 11/0677/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the claim for inheritance transfer tax regarding a portion of real estate allocated to other heirs. The plaintiff argued they were liable for the tax on the consideration paid from outside estate funds, while the defendant contended the final distribution covered these costs. The court ruled that the tax obligation was not established because the assets received in the final division were sufficient to cover the payments made.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Varainsiirtoverolaki 4 § 1 ja 3 mom: The obligation to pay inheritance transfer tax on consideration paid to heirs for estate assets is not triggered if the final inheritance distribution provides sufficient funds to cover such payments.

Keywords

AI generated
inheritance transfer tax estate assets heirs consideration final distribution tax liability administrative court Finland

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Varainsiirtoverolaki 4 § 1 mom
Varainsiirtoverolaki 4 § 3 mom
AI generated
kho-precedent_2001_63
Finnish Supreme Administrative Court ruled MBA costs are business expenses, not salary, exempting employer from advance tax withholding.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2022:16
Supreme Administrative Court quashes waste tax assessment where no clearly separated storage area existed for a landfill site.
kko-precedent_2005_110
Supreme Court allows limited partner to claim tax debt relief in company rehabilitation program under joint liability rules.
kho-precedent_2001_28
Supreme Administrative Court ruled that dividend income is taxable even when derived from capital return on shares.
admin_1992_uusimaa-county__1023
Tax authority allowed taxation of forest land despite land use restrictions under the Land Act.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A sai testamenttiomaisuuden osittaisessa jaossa kiinteistöön kuuluvan määräalan muille perillisille maksamaansa vastiketta vastaan. A oli velvollinen suorittamaan varainsiirtoveroa siitä osuudesta vastiketta, jonka hän oli maksanut pesän ulkopuolisilla varoilla. Asiassa ei katsottu olevan vaikutusta sillä seikalla, että A:n lopullisessa perinnönjaossa saamat varat olisivat riittäneet vastikkeiden maksamiseen.

Varainsiirtoverolaki 4 § 1 ja 3 mom