Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Turun HAO 01.04.2011 11/0089/1 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed hunting permit appeal citing Natura 2000 site protection and bird directive compliance.

Case Number Turun HAO 01.04.2011 11/0089/1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Turku dismissed the association's appeal against a permit granting the applicant a license to hunt up to 200 mink in a Natura 2000 site. The applicant argued the measure was necessary to prevent severe damage to fish stocks, while the association contended it violated bird directive protections. The court ruled that the permit complied with the Natura 2000 site management plan and the relevant bird directive provisions, finding no justification to revoke the administrative decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Luonnonsuojelulaki 38 § 1 mom; Lintudirektiivi 79/409/ETY 9 artikla 1 kohta: A hunting permit issued within a Natura 2000 site management plan and compliant with the bird directive does not constitute a violation of environmental protection laws when justified by specific conservation needs.

Keywords

AI generated
Natura 2000 site management bird directive compliance hunting permit revocation fish stock conservation administrative court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Luonnonsuojelulaki 3 §
Luonnonsuojelulaki 38 § 1 mom
Luonnonsuojelulaki 38 § 1 mom
Luonnonsuojelulaki 39 § 1 mom
Luonnonsuojelulaki 39 § 1 mom
Luonnonsuojelulaki 49 § 3 mom
Luonnonsuojelulaki 49 § 3 mom
Luonnonsuojelulaki 65 § 1 mom
Luonnonsuojelulaki 65 § 1 mom
Lintudirektiivi 79/409/ETY 1 artikla
Lintudirektiivi 79/409/ETY 1 artikla
Lintudirektiivi 79/409/ETY 9 artikla 1 kohta
Lintudirektiivi 79/409/ETY 9 artikla 1 kohta
AI generated
kho-other_2016_673
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against environmental permit limiting fish farm discharge flow rates.
admin_2025_vaasa__1490
Administrative court ruled that groundwater extraction license fee to ministry violates law and constitutes unauthorized task.
kho-precedent_2004_18
Building permit denied on shore zone without plan; lack of management plan causes harm under zoning law.
kho-precedent_2016_148
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses hunting permit for crows and ravens during rest period due to lack of specific damage evidence.
kho-precedent_2014_44
Finnish Supreme Administrative Court dismissed a permit for cormorant hunting due to insufficient evidence of serious damage under the Birds Directive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Yhdistys oli valittanut elinkeino-, liikenne- ja ympäristökeskuksen päätöksestä, jolla keskus oli myöntänyt hakijalle avustajineen luvan ampua korkeintaan 200 merimetsoa 20.8.-31.10.2010 välisenä aikana päätöksen karttaliitteen osoittamilla alueilla kalavesille koituvan vakavan vahingon estämiseksi.

Luonnonsuojelulaki 3 §

Luonnonsuojelulaki 38 § 1 mom

Luonnonsuojelulaki 39 § 1 mom

Luonnonsuojelulaki 49 § 3 mom

Luonnonsuojelulaki 65 § 1 mom

Lintudirektiivi 79/409/ETY 1 artikla

Lintudirektiivi 79/409/ETY 9 artikla 1 kohta