Administrative court dismissed transfer tax claim where property sale was voided by mutual agreement due to quality defects.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Administrative Court of Turku dismissed the claim for transfer tax regarding a property transfer that was mutually rescinded due to quality defects. The seller, who had previously transferred the property, was now required to pay tax on the new transfer. The court ruled that the original sale was voided by mutual agreement, making the subsequent transfer a new legal act subject to tax. Consequently, the tax authority's demand was upheld as the transaction was not merely a continuation of the failed deal but a fresh transfer requiring taxation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedVarainsiirtoverolaki 4 § 1 mom; 40 §: When a property sale is rescinded by mutual agreement due to quality defects and a new transfer occurs, the new transfer constitutes a taxable event requiring the payment of transfer tax.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Myyjä ja ostaja olivat keskinäisellä sopimuksella purkaneet kiinteistön kaupan. Purkamisen syynä olivat kiinteistöllä olleessa asuinrakennuksessa todetut laatuvirheet. Hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ettei ollut todennäköistä, että luovutus olisi sopimusrikkomuksen vuoksi voinut tulla puretuksi tuomiolla. Kyse oli uudesta luovutuksesta, josta kiinteistön myyjänä puretussa kaupassa olleen henkilön oli luovutuksensaajana suoritettava varainsiirtovero.
Varainsiirtoverolaki 4 § 1 mom
Varainsiirtoverolaki 40 §