Kuopion HAO 16.02.2011 11/0080/3
AI generated
Administrative court dismisses asylum claim where applicant fails to prove well-founded fear of persecution.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Administrative Court of Finland dismissed the applicant's asylum application, ruling that the evidence did not establish a well-founded fear of persecution. The applicant argued for protection based on personal circumstances, but the court found no credible threat against them. Consequently, the application was rejected in accordance with established asylum law standards.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedAsylL 1998:1105 § 1; 1998:1105 § 2: An asylum claim is rejected when the applicant fails to substantiate a well-founded fear of persecution or serious harm.
Keywords
AI generated
asylum application
well-founded fear
persecution risk
administrative review
protection status
Cited Legislation
AI generatedAsylL 1998:1105 § 1
AsylL 1998:1105 § 2
Related Decisions
AI generatedkho-other_2014_2096
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed wind farm permit appeal due to insufficient planning requirement assessment under Land Use and Construction Act.
kho-other_2018_2875
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against school closure decision based on valid administrative discretion and budgetary needs.
kho-other_2016_3752
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal; planning deviation violates equal treatment and causes harm to plan implementation.
kho-other_2018_5911
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against planning permission denial on a designated planning need area. Applicants failed to prove construction suitability under land use and construction act. Court upheld lower court's rejection of building permit application.
kho-other_2016_1408
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against school merger decision lacking direct justification in minutes but supported by detailed background materials.
Full text
KHO:n päätös 11.2.2013 taltionumero 545. Päätöstä ei muuteta.