Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Kouvolan HAO 01.03.2011 11/0093/2, 11/0094/2 AI generated

Campsite users lacked appeal rights for outdoor activity regulations but retained rights to appeal orders removing their caravans.

Case Number Kouvolan HAO 01.03.2011 11/0093/2, 11/0094/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court ruled that campsite visitors could not appeal administrative decisions regarding outdoor activity regulations but could appeal orders mandating the removal of their caravans. The court distinguished between regulatory measures affecting usage and specific enforcement actions targeting property. Consequently, the appeal regarding the regulations was dismissed while the right to challenge the removal order remained intact.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 § 1 mom.; Administrative decisions concerning outdoor activity regulations do not grant appeal rights to campsite users, whereas orders requiring the removal of their caravans do.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal rights campsite regulations outdoor activity law property removal order administrative court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 § 1 mom.
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 § 1 mom.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO:n päätökset 30.4.2012 taltiot 1068 ja 1069
KHO:n päätökset 30.4.2012 taltiot 1068 ja 1069.
AI generated
kho-other_2020_2945
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal permission request for planning decision due to lack of legal interest.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2018:1
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal by municipality and residents' association against Traffic Agency's noise restriction denial. The court ruled that the decision affects their rights and must be reconsidered.
kho-other_2015_3447
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against general plan approval based on unequal treatment of landowner's existing structures.
kho-other_2018_4379
Supreme Administrative Court partially allowed appeal against town council's coastal zone plan amendment due to insufficient environmental impact studies.
admin_2009_turku__420
Administrative court dismisses appeal by tenant claiming municipal council membership violates equality law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Leirintäalueelta kausipaikan vuokranneilla henkilöillä ei ollut valitusoikeutta leirintäalueilmoitusta koskevasta päätöksestä, jolla oli annettu leirintäalueen käyttöä koskevia ulkoilulaissa tarkoitettuja määräyksiä. Sen sijaan samoilla henkilöillä oli oikeus valittaa rakennuslautakunnan päätöksestä, jolla oli velvoitettu poistamaan kyseiseltä leirintäalueelta muutoksenhakijoiden omistamia asuntovaunuja ja niihin liittyviä kiinteitä rakennelmia.

Lainkohdat:

Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 § 1 mom.

Päätöksestä on valitettu KHO:een.

KHO:n päätökset 30.4.2012 taltiot 1068 ja 1069. Valitukset peruutettu. Lausuminen valituksissa esitetyistä vaatimuksista raukeaa.