Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Hämeenlinnan HAO 18.11.2011 11/0658/2 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses sister's appeal regarding urn transfer, ruling no direct legal interest exists under administrative law.

Case Number Hämeenlinnan HAO 18.11.2011 11/0658/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the sister's complaint regarding the transfer of the deceased's ashes urn. Although the regional authority granted permission based on the widow's and children's request, the court found the sister lacked standing because the decision did not directly affect her legal rights. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as the sister was not a party with a direct legal interest in the matter.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Hautaustoimilaki 24 §; Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 §, 51 § 2 momentti: A third party named in a grave register lacks standing to challenge a decision on urn transfer unless the decision directly affects their specific legal rights, duties, or benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative standing urn transfer permission direct legal interest grave register entry administrative appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Hautaustoimilaki 24 §
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 §
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 §
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 51 § 2 momentti
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 51 § 2 momentti
AI generated
kko-other_2000_1351
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; lower court lacked jurisdiction over dispute between heirs regarding burial site selection.
kho-precedent_2013_75
Appeal dismissed; death home moved to wrong court; regional office has nationwide authority.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2022:121
Supreme Administrative Court allows family members' appeal against deportation based on ECHR Art. 8 and EU Charter rights.
admin_2025_eastern-finland__628
Administrative court dismisses appeal by minor under 15 as they lack standing to appeal custody restrictions alone.
kho-precedent_1998_82
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against lower court's decision to leave municipal road access claim unexamined.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

PÄÄTÖSLYHENNELMÄ

Itä-Suomen aluehallintovirasto oli vainajan puolison ja lasten hakemuksesta myöntänyt luvan tuhkauurnan siirtämiseen. Hallinto-oikeus jätti vainajan sisaren tekemän valituksen tutkimatta. Hautaustoimilaissa ei ole erityistä säännöstä siitä, kenellä on oikeus hakea tuhkauurnan siirtämistä. Kysymys valitusoikeudesta on siten ratkaistava hallintolainkäyttölain säännösten perusteella. Päätös ei välittömästi kohdistunut sisareen sen vuoksi, että hän on hautakirjaan merkitty asiakas siinä haudassa, johon kyseessä oleva vainaja on haudattuna. Päätös ei muutoinkaan välittömästi vaikuttanut sisaren oikeuteen, velvollisuuteen tai etuun.

Oikeusohjeet

Hautaustoimilaki 24 §

Hallintolainkäyttölaki 6 §

Hallintolainkäyttölaki 51 § 2 momentti