Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Turun HAO 24.02.2010 10/0180/2 AI generated

Administrative court allows caregiver contract to survive municipal merger, requiring new entity to terminate first.

Case Number Turun HAO 24.02.2010 10/0180/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Finland allowed the caregiver's claim that a municipal merger could not unilaterally apply stricter support criteria to an existing agreement. The plaintiff had a valid contract with a municipality that later merged into a new city, which attempted to enforce tighter eligibility rules immediately. The court ruled that the new entity must first terminate the old contract before applying new standards, granting the caregiver two months' pay under the original terms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki omaishoidon tuesta 1 §; 3 §; 4 § 1 mom; 5 §; 6 §; 8 §; 9 §; 11 §; 12 §: A municipal merger does not permit the successor entity to unilaterally apply stricter caregiver support criteria to an existing valid contract; the successor must first terminate the original agreement before enforcing new eligibility rules.

Keywords

AI generated
municipal merger caregiver support contract termination administrative law successor liability eligibility criteria unilateral application

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 1 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 1 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 3 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 3 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 4 § 1 mom
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 4 § 1 mom
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 5 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 5 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 6 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 6 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 8 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 8 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 9 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 9 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 11 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 11 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 12 §
Laki omaishoidon tuesta 12 §

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO:n päätös 7.5.2012 taltionumero 1137
KHO:n päätös 7.5.2012 taltionumero 1137.
AI generated
ECLI:FI:KHO:2020:136
Supreme Administrative Court allows caregiver to split statutory leave days into shorter periods against city's unilateral change.
admin_1987_kuopio-county__28
County court orders municipality to pay foster care costs when mother's home town is deemed child's home town.
labour_2006_69
Labor court dismisses union appeal allowing employer to terminate fixed-term contracts due to economic reasons.
kho-precedent_2016_143
Supreme Administrative Court allows caregiver contract termination by letter without hearing, ruling on statutory notice periods.
admin_2006_kuopio__176
Administrative court dismissed child support claim due to statute of limitations and rejected interest under interest law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oikeuskysymyksenä oli kuntaliitoksen vaikutus toistaiseksi voimassa olevaan omaishoitosopimukseen.

A oli tehnyt X:n kunnan kanssa toistaiseksi voimassa olevan omaishoitosopimuksen lapsensa hoitamisesta kotona. X:n kunta liitettiin sittemmin Y:n kaupunkiin. Hallinto-oikeus katsoi, että Y:n kaupunki ei voinut ryhtyä yksipuolisesti soveltamaan Y:n kaupungissa kuntaliitoksen jälkeen käyttöön otettuja, tiukennettuja omaishoidon tuen myöntämisperusteita A:n sopimukseen. Y:n kaupungin olisi pitänyt ensin irtisanoa A:n aiempi sopimus. A:lla oli oikeus saada vanhan sopimuksen mukainen hoitopalkkio kahden kuukauden irtisanomisajalta.

Laki omaishoidon tuesta 1 §

Laki omaishoidon tuesta 3 §

Laki omaishoidon tuesta 4 § 1 mom

Laki omaishoidon tuesta 5 §

Laki omaishoidon tuesta 6 §

Laki omaishoidon tuesta 8 §

Laki omaishoidon tuesta 9 §

Laki omaishoidon tuesta 11 §

Laki omaishoidon tuesta 12 §

KHO:n päätös 7.5.2012 taltionumero 1137. KHO ei muuta hallinto-oikeuden päätöstä.