Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Kouvolan HAO 29.04.2010 10/0294/2 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed subdivision permit application as it falls under land formation law, not building act exceptions.

Case Number Kouvolan HAO 29.04.2010 10/0294/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Finland dismissed the applicant's request for a building act exception to subdivide a holiday home site. The Technical Board had rejected the application, and the court agreed that subdivision is governed by the Land Formation Act rather than the Building Act. Consequently, the court held that no exception under the Building Act could apply to this specific type of land division.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Kiinteistönmuodostamislaki 34 §; 19 luku: Subdivision of a holiday home site is regulated by the Land Formation Act, not the Building Act, meaning no building act exception applies to such divisions.

Keywords

AI generated
subdivision permit holiday home site Land Formation Act Building Act exception administrative court jurisdictional scope technical board

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Kiinteistönmuodostamislaki 34 §
Kiinteistönmuodostamislaki 34 § ja 19 luku
Kiinteistönmuodostamislaki 19 luku
maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki
AI generated
admin_2004_hameenlinna__1
Administrative court dismissed appeal as planning exception no longer needed after plan approval.
kho-precedent_2013_59
Supreme Administrative Court allows planning exception claim when other valid legal grounds exist despite missing land management report.
kho-other_2016_416
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against ELY rejection, ruling that a coastal zone plan exists for the sauna building site.
kho-precedent_2002_32
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed a building permit exception for a holiday home near a Natura 2000 wetland due to planning harm.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2024:7
Supreme Administrative Court allows variance for sauna despite regional plan zoning rules lacking direct legal effect on individual projects.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Tekninen lautakunta oli hylännyt poikkeamishakemuksen, joka koski rantayleiskaavassa osoitetun lomarakennuspaikan lohkomista kahdeksi lomarakennuspaikaksi.

Rakennuspaikan lohkomisesta säädetään kiinteistönmuodostamislaissa. Alueiden suunnittelusta, rakentamisesta ja käyttämisestä säädetään puolestaan maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaissa. Koska hakemuksessa ei osaksikaan ollut kyse rakentamisesta, ei pelkästään lohkomisen suorittamiseen voitu hakea maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaissa tarkoitettua poikkeamista. Tämän vuoksi hallinto-oikeus kumosi ja poisti teknisen lautakunnan päätöksen ja hylkäsi poikkeamista koskevan hakemuksen.

Kiinteistönmuodostamislaki 34 § ja 19 luku