Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HAO 18.05.2010 10/0730/3 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed legal aid fee claim submitted after main decision was rendered.

Case Number Helsingin HAO 18.05.2010 10/0730/3
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the request to award fees for a legal aid attorney because the fee and expense claim was submitted after the main decision had already been rendered. Although the legal aid office had granted aid on February 4, 2010, the claim documents were only presented to the court on March 15, 2010, following the February 22, 2010 ruling. The court held that since the substantive proceedings on fees concluded with the main decision, the late submission rendered the fee award request inadmissible under the relevant legal aid statute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Oikeusapulaki 18 § 2 ja 3 momentti (927/2008): A legal aid fee claim submitted after the main decision is rendered is inadmissible if the substantive proceedings on fees have already concluded with that decision.

Keywords

AI generated
legal aid fees procedural deadline late submission administrative court fee award inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Oikeusapulaki 18 § 2 ja 3 momentti (927/2008)
Oikeusapulaki 18 § 2 ja 3 momentti (927/2008)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Helsingin HAO 29.11.2010 taltionumero 10/1601/1
Samoin Helsingin HAO 29.11.2010 taltionumero 10/1601/1
AI generated
admin_2011_oulu__169
Administrative court denied state funding for legal aid agent after main case concluded and request submitted late.
kho-precedent_2014_177
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed lawyer's fee claim filed after main proceedings concluded due to lack of prior demand.
admin_2025_eastern-finland__2087
Administrative court dismissed lawyer's fee claim for state funds due to late submission after main case conclusion.
kho-precedent_2013_16
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses lawyer's fee claim after case end due to lawyer's delay in submitting documents.
admin_2003_kuopio__52
Administrative court dismissed lawyer fee claim for pre-proceeding acts under legal aid statute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oikeusaputoimisto oli 4.2.2010 päättänyt oikeusavun myöntämisestä. Hallinto-oikeus antoi ratkaisun pääasiassa 22.2.2010. Oikeusapupäätös ja avustajan lasku esitettiin hallinto-oikeudelle vasta pääasiassa annetun ratkaisun jälkeen 15.3.2010.

Koska edellä selostetuissa oloissa asian käsittely myös palkkio- ja kulukysymyksen osalta oli päättynyt hallinto-oikeuden pääasiassa antamalla päätöksellä, hallinto-oikeus hylkäsi avustajan palkkion määräämistä koskevan vaatimuksen.

Oikeusapulaki 18 § 2 ja 3 momentti (927/2008)

Samoin Helsingin HAO 29.11.2010 taltionumero 10/1601/1