Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HAO 30.12.2010 10/1149/2 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed claim for social work costs as income assessment tasks were not child protection follow-up work.

Case Number Helsingin HAO 30.12.2010 10/1149/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the city's claim to recover social work costs incurred during income assessment procedures. The court determined that tasks related to determining benefit amounts did not constitute child protection follow-up work under the Child Welfare Act. Consequently, the municipality was not obligated to reimburse Espoo City for these specific administrative expenses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Sosiaalihuoltolaki 18 §; Lastensuojelulaki 16 § 1 mom: Costs for administrative tasks regarding income assessment are not recoverable as child protection follow-up expenses under the Child Welfare Act.

Keywords

AI generated
child welfare act follow-up care costs income assessment tasks municipal reimbursement administrative court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Sosiaalihuoltolaki 18 §
Lastensuojelulaki 16 § 1 mom

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Helsingin HAO 30.12.2010 10/1148/2
City court dismissed appeal; social worker costs for food assistance were valid child welfare costs under Child Welfare Act.
AI generated
admin_2010_helsinki__1148
City court dismissed appeal; social worker costs for food assistance were valid child welfare costs under Child Welfare Act.
admin_1989_hame-county__975
Administrative court dismissed Finnish social board's claim for cross-border child care costs against Swedish municipality.
admin_1988_uusimaa-county__1767
Court allows full disability benefit for personal assistant costs, excluding income from calculation.
insurance_1997_7497-1996
Court allows disability service costs as reasonable rehabilitation expenses under accident insurance law.
kho-precedent_2012_92
Social services claim dismissed for missing six-month filing deadline under child protection and social care laws.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Hallintoriita-asiassa, jossa Espoon sosiaali- ja terveyslautakunta oli vaatinut Helsingin kaupungin velvoittamista korvaamaan N:n lastensuojelulain mukaisesta jälkihuollosta aiheutuneet sosiaalityön kustannukset viranhaltijan työtunneista, oli kiistaa siitä, mitkä kustannukset olivat korvattavia sosiaalityön kustannuksia.

Hallinto-oikeus katsoi, että hallintoriidan kohteena olevat toimeentulon maksattamisesta ja maksettavan toimeentulotuen määrän selvittämisestä aiheutuneet etuuskäsittelijän työtunnit eivät olleet sellaista jälkihuoltoon liittyvää sosiaalityötä, josta aiheutuneet kustannukset Helsingin kaupunki olisi lastensuojelulain 16 §:n 1 momentin nojalla velvollinen korvaamaan Espoon kaupungille.

Vrt. Helsingin HAO 30.12.2010 taltionumero 10/1148/2

Sosiaalihuoltolaki 18 §

Lastensuojelulaki 16 § 1 ja 2 mom