Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Turun HAO 19.11.2009 09/0408/1 AI generated

Building permit granted where construction stayed within agreed land use rights despite one owner's opposition.

Case Number Turun HAO 19.11.2009 09/0408/1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Turku dismissed the objection to a building permit because the construction project remained within the building rights defined in the registered land division agreement. Although one co-owner opposed the permit, the court found that the applicants demonstrated lawful control of the site by adhering to the agreed-upon building area. Consequently, the court ruled that the project did not require the consent of the other co-owners under the relevant land use and construction law provisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 131 § 1 mom; When a building project complies with the building rights established in a registered land division agreement, the consent of other co-owners is not required.

Keywords

AI generated
building permit approval land division agreement co-owner consent requirement registered property rights administrative court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 131 § 1 mom
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 131 § 1 mom
AI generated
kho-precedent_2013_43
Supreme Administrative Court allows building permit despite revoked consent under shared possession agreement.
kho-other_2017_6238
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeals against planning authority decisions permitting construction with a water connection requirement.
kho-precedent_2007_66
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal due to lack of standing under Building Act 190 § 3. Appeal rejected without review as no leave to appeal granted.
kho-other_2016_416
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against ELY rejection, ruling that a coastal zone plan exists for the sauna building site.
kho-other_2016_3849
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against wind farm zoning plan approval due to procedural errors and environmental impact concerns.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asiassa oli oikeuskysymyksenä ratkaistavana se, hallitsivatko rakennusluvan hakijat rakennuspaikkaa maankäyttö- ja rakennuslain edellyttämällä tavalla. Tontin osaomistajat olivat solmineet keskenään kiinteistörekisteriin kirjatun hallinnanjakosopimuksen, mutta yksi tontin osaomistaja oli vastustanut rakennusluvan myöntämistä.

Kun otettiin huomioon kiinteistörekisteriin kirjatun hallinnanjakosopimuksen edellä mainittu sisältö sekä se, ettei rakennushanke ylittänyt hallinnanjakosopimuksen mukaiselle rakennuspaikalle 7a määriteltyä rakennusoikeutta, hallinto-oikeus katsoi, että luvanhakijat olivat osoittaneet hallitsevansa tuota rakennuspaikkaa maankäyttö- ja rakennuslain edellyttämällä tavalla. Rakennushanke ei näin ollen edellyttänyt tontin muiden osaomistajien suostumusta.

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 131 § 1 mom