Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HAO 30.11.2007 07/1820/5 AI generated

Planning authority decision revoked for violating planning act and causing unequal treatment of landowners.

Case Number Helsingin HAO 30.11.2007 07/1820/5
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court revoked the municipal council's decision to approve the master plan for a small housing area. The court found that the council had improperly used its discretion by granting building rights to some landowners while excluding others who had not signed land use agreements, contrary to the Planning and Building Act. This unequal treatment violated the statutory purpose of the specific planning provision, necessitating the annulment of the decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Planning and Building Act s. 91 b § 1; Planning and Building Act s. 10 §: The planning authority must exercise its discretion in accordance with the statutory purpose of the specific planning provision and cannot grant building rights based on criteria other than those prescribed by law, thereby preventing unequal treatment of landowners.

Keywords

AI generated
master plan approval building rights allocation discretionary power abuse unequal treatment Planning and Building Act land use agreement administrative review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Planning and Building Act s. 91 b § 1
Planning and Building Act s. 10 §
AI generated
admin_2003_hameenlinna__519
Administrative court dismissed appeal against municipal land use agreement requiring owner to share planning costs.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2017:202
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against zoning change where equal treatment lacks specific planning grounds.
kko-precedent_1993_29
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; existing zoning plan binding for acquisition without new subdivision approval.
kho-precedent_2008_71
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed zoning change due to violation of equal treatment and content requirements.
kho-precedent_2008_12
Unapproved building guidelines do not constitute binding planning rules under the Planning and Building Act.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pientaloalueen asemakaavassa oli osoitettu poikkeavan vähän rakennusoikeutta niille tonteille ja alueille, joiden omistajat eivät olleet tehneet kunnan edellyttämää maankäyttösopimusta. Maankäyttösopimuksilla ja niiden tekemättä jättämisillä oli maankäyttö- ja rakennuslain 91 b §:n 1 momentin tarkoituksen vastaisesti sitovasti vaikutettu kaavan sisältöön rakennusoikeuden määrän osalta. Asemakaavan sisältö oli rakennusoikeuden osalta määräytynyt muilla kuin maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaissa tarkoitetuilla maankäytöllisillä perusteilla. Noudatettu menettely oli johtanut kaava-alueen maanomistajien eriarvoiseen kohteluun. Kunnanvaltuusto oli käyttänyt väärin sille kuuluvaa harkintavaltaa. Asemakaavan hyväksymistä koskenut päätös kumottiin.